Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 March 31

< March 30	April 1 >

March 31

File:Trophylaureusawards.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#10a - no author information given. URL of image location is given, but no other source information. Mosmof (talk) 00:37, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete Doesn't seem to fit the criteria for Fair Use, not by a mile. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 15:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Find free use image insteadLoved Nexus (talk) 05:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:E-factor Equation.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

should not be an image, I replaced with a math formula Llightex (talk) 01:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Better visual representation than "written" formula.Loved Nexus (talk) 05:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PMI Equation.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

same as above Llightex (talk) 01:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Better visual representation than "written" formula.Loved Nexus Loved Nexus (talk) 05:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Polysomy nondisjunction.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. See the source page Klortho (talk) 03:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC) Source page was listed as well as search parameters during initial upload and at time of approval (by human) to Wiki Commons. Further explanation requested.--Ssumpf (talk) 04:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lady-Bird-Johnson-Forever-Stamps.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as replaceable non-free media. This stamp sheet is non-free, but the individual stamps should be free, but the one most critical to use, the one commemorating Ladybird, definitely is. That one , while published after 1978, is a crop of the official WH portrait of Ladybird ([1]), which is PD-Gov, and the addition of text and the like is not creative enough for a new copyright so that stamp image alone is PD-Gov. The five other stamps are reprints of 1966/69 stamps (and as per [2], " have been adapted for printing in offset lithography" in 2012). Assuming that the adaptation is not considered creative the 2012 reprints would not be a new copyright. But even that said, the original 1966/69 stamps could be used (since they were made to showcase the planting concept that Ladybird led) as PD-USgov alongside the 2012 portrait stamp to achieve the same image on the article about her commemoration in stamps. The middle part of this sheet (with the quote and photo shot) are not necessary to understand this commemoration if all these other stamp images are provided freely. MASEM (t) 06:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Find free media to replace itLoved Nexus (talk) 05:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kalpesh kevat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UE: self-portrait uploaded by serial self-promoter, now blocked. JohnCD (talk) 11:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Decorative, non-functional. Notability issues.Loved Nexus (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:StudioEgo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by higher-quality file File:Studio e.go! logo.jpg Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 16:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Replace by higher quality, too smallLoved Nexus (talk) 05:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:File name.ext

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the

WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡

17:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC) Error: You must replace File_name.ext with the actual name of the file you are nominating for deletion when using {{subst:ffd2}}.[reply]

Buckminsterfullerinstitute (talk) 16:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dymaxion map unfolded.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file is not in the commons and violates copyright: http://bfi.org/about-fuller/big-ideas/dymaxion-world/dymaxion-map

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Artist album.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#3a - the cover of the soundtrack is near-identical to the film's poster at The Artist (film), so we do not need the soundtrack cover on the same page. Soundtrack itself does not appear notable for its own page. MASEM (t) 17:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.