Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 October 20

< October 19	October 21 >

October 20

File:Peniston Finally CDS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Local consensus in

WP:NFCC. In this case, the song is of American origin by American singer, and this image was of French release. I would like to start another RFC discussion at the article talk page, but that would be redundant as I prefer to keep the US "sunflower" cover, used in the infobox. George Ho (talk) 05:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I suggest a passive approach, so Keep the French cover -- since it's there. If it's deleted, let it stay so. Eman235/talk 20:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All right,

MOS:MUSIC? --George Ho (talk) 04:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

If there was more information on the French edition in the article, that might help. As it is, it's rather a weak case. Eman235/talk 06:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No sources have discussed the French cover, Eman. I checked through Google News and Books. By the way, what do you mean "weak case"? George Ho (talk) 06:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By "weak case" I mean, I can see a lot of people voting "Delete" on this, because the French cover doesn't seem particularly notable or useful. Eman235/talk 22:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Juliana Maio Headshot, 2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright is generally held by the subject or the photographer, not someone who "arranged for photo to be taken" Flat Out (talk) 05:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sevilla Bridge via Google Street View.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus license. Google Streetview is copyrighted. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kalentong Bridge via Google Street View.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus license. Google Streetview is copyrighted. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MattGallagher2013PENFaulkner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F11 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm nominating this here due to the history of the uploader changing information on this image constantly that I'm not sure what is true about it anymore. At first, the image had no licensing tag; the uploader then added a free licensing tag. However, the source that the uploader provided illustrated that the image was not their work, so I tagged the image for

use on Wikipedia.) Steel1943 (talk) 13:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Broken Line Monument, Tallinn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ethan Doyle White (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Violation of

Stefan2 (talk) 23:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.