Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 December 31

< December 30	January 1 >

December 31

File:Chapters Interior.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned, low-quality photo. Better alternatives, like File:ChaptersMarkham.jpg File:Chapters Indigo stores in Canada.IMG 4655.jpg, and File:A whole lotta books at Chapters (50170571086).jpg, exist. ✗plicit 02:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explicit, I adjusted the levels and rotated it, I'd say keep now. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:57, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:I Will Survive - G. Gaynor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An artwork used for German (ebay, discogs, 45cat) and French (ebay, discogs) releases. I uploaded a

WP:NFCC#1. There is also a free image of Gloria Gaynor in case the cover art is deleted. George Ho (talk) 02:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Final Fantasy III - Original Sound Version mix.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A mix sample of the

WP:NFC#CS. George Ho (talk) 04:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Samples of music of Final Fantasy IV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 00:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All samples of the

WP:NFC#CS. George Ho (talk) 04:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Samples of music of Final Fantasy V

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 00:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All samples of the

WP:NFC#CS. George Ho (talk) 04:55, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Danielle gimme.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Gimme Little Sign#Danielle Brisebois version was merged into Gimme Little Sign#Cover versions -FASTILY 01:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cover art of one of less successful versions of

WP:NFC#CS. George Ho (talk) 05:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:NFC#CS: identify an object, style, or behavior, that is a subject of discussion in the article. Whether Gimme Little Sign#Danielle Brisebois version qualifies as "a subject of discussion in the article" or is more like a passing mention (which everything in Gimme Little Sign#Cover versions clearly would be) is something that could be argued about. I'll say keep, but a case could be made to merge Gimme Little Sign#Danielle Brisebois version into Gimme Little Sign#Cover versions which would more clearly reduce it to a passing mention, voiding the non-free rationale. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 17:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@Alexis Jazz: I recently eliminated less worthy cover versions and merged two sections into one (diff). I hope this changes your mind. Also, either way, I don't see why being a front cover of a release is sufficient enough to keep it... unless there's enough coverage to discuss/cover the release. Honestly, from what I see, the release wasn't as successful as prior versions. George Ho (talk) 19:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

George Ho, "recently" means "just now" or you linked the wrong diff? The infobox makes no sense without its own section, which you just merged, so I removed the infobox. If all this doesn't get reverted it'll get deleted per CSD F5. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 20:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...."just now". George Ho (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FHS - Exterior.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own-work claims. Professional shots, one of which contains "Albert Lim KS photographer" in its EXIF. Requires

WP:VRT permission. ✗plicit 11:31, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete all, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:33, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Otto Acron carrying a horse up the ladders.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this local file was exported to Commons as c:File:Otto Acron carrying a horse up the ladders.jpg by User:H005. This is Otto Acron carrying a horse up some ladders. It's exactly what it says on the tin. It was uploaded by User:Otto Acron in July 2009. Theoretically possible: Otto was born in May 1935 so he'd be 74 years old at the time of upload. It's unclear when exactly this photo was taken, but presumably decades ago as elderly men don't carry horses around. The question is how plausible it is that this is actually own work. Maybe he had a really long wire to trigger the shutter or something, but carrying a horse up some ladders doesn't seem like the best time for multitasking. Considering he'd typically perform for an audience, having someone else take the photo seems less crazy. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mr-Australia-1985.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this file was exported to Commons by User:H005 as c:File:Mr-Australia-1985.jpg.

See above. Similar problem, but this is a photo

WP:VRT permission anyway if the own work claim would be true. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shilajeet Majumdar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious self authorship claim. Low res, no EXIF, all other user uploads copvios stolen from social media (e.g., File:Shabareesh Varma.jpg is just a horizontal flip of this, see also c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anupama Parameswaran.jpg for an en.wiki upload by this user subsequently transferred to Commons), etc. Эlcobbola _talk 21:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Finally 12-inch Choice Mix.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Almost four years have passed since the

WP:NFCC#8

back then, which I'm doing now. Didn't matter then; the discussion was relisted twice and lasted almost seven months back when FFD was tremendously backlogged.

Anyways, I recently pushed the sample down to body, but I don't know whether critical commentary is sufficient enough to support the sample. Furthermore, I don't know whether the sample helps readers understand the song in context and is too contextually significant to be deleted. If neither, and if no objections, then the sample should be deleted. George Ho (talk) 22:27, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Townsville Aboriginal and Torris Strait Islander Centre1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and low-quality derivative work of a presumably copyrighted banner or poster. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:17, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gimme Little Sign - Brenton Wood.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cover art (front or back?) of "

WP:NFCC#8 (i.e. inadequately identifies the song in context). No need to use an overseas sleeve in lieu of the US release. George Ho (talk) 23:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

George Ho, I agree so I replaced the infobox image resulting in this image being tagged with CSD F5. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 17:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.