Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 February 26

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< February 25 February 27 >

February 26

File:Pyotr Glebov.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyotr Glebov.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Knightoften (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Originally tagged for deletion with {{

WP:ITSFAIRUSE for more on this). There is actually a freely-licensed image of Pyotr Glebov (File:Pyotr Glebov Postal card Russia 2015.jpg) being used for primary identification purposes; so, even though Glebov is deceased, the rationale provided for this file's current use isn't really correct per WP:NFCC#1; even if the argument presented would be considered OK per WP:FREER for use in the "Pyotr Glebov" article, that argument would apply to file's non-free use in the biography about Glebov, not articles about film he appeared in, even if he had a major roll in the film. This was contested by Knightoften with the rationale on the file's talk page. Listing here as a neutral party for further discussion. ƏXPLICIT 00:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

@
WP:FILMNFI, "a non-free screenshot can be sometimes be uploaded and used in Wikipedia articles about films, usually only when the screenshot itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary," but it does not have to be as just mentioned - in this case, there is no free equivalent. It is believed that this image depicting the distinct military garb of the subject enhances reader understanding of the topic more than words or available free-use content alone can communicate. I defer to the experts, of course, if that doesn't meet #8; this is my first time uploading an image. I had no idea it was so complicated.Knightoften (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Yes I did read the talk page, and I reiterate that the use of the image fails
WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
@Whpq: Just checking, cheers Knightoften (talk) 21:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jay Neveloff Headshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Permission confirmed valid. Stifle (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jay Neveloff Headshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NinaSpezz (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image is sourced to Flickr and it does have a CC-BY-SA listed there. However, that Flickr user's photostream has a grand total of this one single image. The EXIF on the image indicates the copyright holder as "(c)DavidBeyda".

OTRS confirmation of permission would be required. Whpq (talk) 01:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bohrium hassium meitnerium ceremony.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bohrium hassium meitnerium ceremony.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Double sharp (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails

WP:NFCC#8 as this is a decorative image being used in articles of chemical elements and does not identify subject of discussion in the articles (i.e. the chemical elements). Wcam (talk) 14:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hunt Saboteurs Association logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC) delete Copyright violation Hsa1963 (talk) 18:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aardakh 1944.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Stifle (talk) 17:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aardakh 1944.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 3E1I5S8B9RF7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Takhirgeran Umar with the reason "The photograph does not show the eviction of the Chechens and Ingush, perhaps it is Ukraine. I also admit that this is a picture from a movie." FASTILY 22:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be a better source to challenge this claim than just a random post of some guy on Facebook.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 11:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is there an authoritative source in which it says that this is a deportation picture? We have no such.--Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 07:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2021_February_26&oldid=1011028034"