Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 March 29

< March 28	March 30 >

March 29

File:La Barca Condado.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Barca Condado.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Misleading COVID-19 vaccination maps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong venue. These are all files on Commons, and this appears to be an editorial question, not a copyright-related concern. Please initiate and/or continue discussion on the relevant article talk page(s) please. Thanks, FASTILY 21:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jaswinder1122 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

@

talk) 04:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Jaswinder1122 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Jaswinder1122 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Jaswinder1122 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

These (often outdated) maps are based on the raw number of doses given without giving any sense of what the denominator should be. The vaccination program in Wales is making the most progress in the UK. But you would never know it from the map which uses the darkest colour for England simply because it has the highest population. We should remove these from articles until the ncov site decides to visualize its data in a useful way. Connor Behan (talk) 03:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, creator of ncovtrack here. To display the maps with respect of the population of each reginon/area/country, tap on the 1M button on the bottom right of the map. Georgek98 (talk) 01:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh great. So the most useful visualization is already there. I think the maps on Wikipedia should be replaced with the 1M versions. And now a less crucial question: can they be downloaded in a vector format instead of PNG? Connor Behan (talk) 05:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds cool. I gave the same instructions to

Jaswinder1122's page for this. Good question. For now I don't have this functionality, but I can work on it if it can be useful? Currently I am swamped with lots of college work, so I may work on it sometime around May. Georgek98 (talk) 19:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abay Monument in Almaty.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan. Also, English Wikipedia only accepts images of unfree buildings from no FOP countries, but not public art (see Wikipedia:Freedom of panorama). Images of public art are only accepted here under fair use tagging, but its use on a biographical article of the person that the statue depicts, and as a secondary image at Palace of the Republic, Almaty, fails fair use (see Wikipedia:Non-free content). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:54, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To quote the relevant item at Wikipedia:Non-free content#Unacceptable use: "9. A magazine or book cover, to illustrate the article on the person whose photograph is on the cover.... Similarly, a photo of a copyrighted statue (assuming there is no freedom of panorama in the country where the statue was when the photo was taken) can only be used to discuss the statue itself, not the subject of it." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ford Chief Executive Officer James D. Farley.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Claims to be PD, but, I can't see anything on the Ford media site that actually states that the images are public domain/freely licensed. Highly suspect these are copyrighted. Lewis Cawte (Talk) 16:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Republican flag of Leicestershire.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a fictional/unofficial movement flag with questionable licensing (Fandom seems to show it as a GNU license now, but, seems to have blocked File: namespace access).

Also not likely to be used for any notable article and not used in user space. Lewis Cawte (Talk) 16:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kong bai ji.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Web resolution without EXIF. Possible copyright infringement. Sreejith K (talk) 17:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Multiple audio samples for the Caretaker's Everywhere at the End of Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete under criterion G7 -FASTILY 10:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as the uploader of these files myself, all of them together make the article have an excessive number of short audio clips, which breaks rule #1 of unacceptable multimedia use, found on the subsection below

WP:TOP100. The article they are included in, the Everywhere at the End of Time

album series, already has enough audio samples. I would say a maximum of one audio sample for each album subsection is good enough.

– Wetrorave (talk) 17:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Riot in Lagos.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

De-PRODded by ETHJILA for this reason: The file significantly clarifies the composer's influence on electronic music. Argument given for deletion is rather an argument to improve the article. I tried finding reliable sources, like a Variety article, that would have improved articles Ryuichi Sakamoto and electro (music). Even so, I'm not confident that improving the article would justify usage of the sample. NFCC#8 ("contextual significance") expects deletion of a file to harm understanding of a topic, like a composer or a music genre. Maybe deleting the sample would harm the understanding, or maybe not. To me, the composer and the genre can be already understood without sample. All I can hear is just music... electro music. But then I can stand corrected. George Ho (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Command Decision screenshot1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook

WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth -FASTILY 22:57, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The screenshot is used in the plot section of

WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 22:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Strong keep -

WP:FILMNFI is not policy, is a part of the MoS and is therefore simply a guideline. The poster illustrates not the film, but how the film was marketed which is not the same thing. The image illustrates the cast of the film in character and in their relationship to each other, which is of value to the reader in learnig about the film -- you know, the thing we're supposed to be doing, serving our readers, not mechanically checking off boxes from a bureaucratic form. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Posters do illustrate the film, which is why a majority of the files used in film infoboxes are posters. Readers do not need to see the cast of a film in character or in relationship to each other to understand the film. If so, every film would have a screenshot. There needs to be critical commentary about the screenshot itself to justify

WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 23:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.