Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 March 7

< March 6	March 8 >

March 7

File:Matter Life Death Hunter Niven.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook

WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is substantially expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth. -FASTILY 05:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Before My Ken (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

The screenshot is used in the Cast section of

WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 03:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep - The image shows the film's two stars, David Niven and Kim Hunter, in character, and is useful for that reason. It's exclusion would indeed make the article less valuable than it is. This nomination is an example of pure
WP:BURO, without the least bit of consideration given to what's good for our readers or for the article itself. As such, approving it would damage Wikipedia rather than enhance it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Readers do not need to see the stars of a film to understand it. If so, every film would have a screenshot. There needs to be critical commentary about the screenshot itself to justify

WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IPG Oxford MA HQ building.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have doubts about this freedom of this file. It illustrates the subject better than my original photo, and I want to transfer to Commons. However, the low resolution and lack of metadata (especially considering that the uploader claims to have taken it on an iPhone) suggests he copied it from somewhere. Also, the uploader is blocked indefinitely for sockpuppet abuse, so it's not like I can ask him to upload a higher resolution version. The only saving grace is that I did not get any hits using reverse image searches. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brigita Krašovec on the podium of Ribbon Final at International Tournament Guadalajara in 2018.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is not needed to understand how this person competed at the International Tournament Guadalajara in 2018, this can be done by text alone and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. The rationale includes "It presents the image of a person." and "For visual identification of the object of the article." However, this can be done with free media as this is a living person. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 13:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Duplicate screenshots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 April 16. ✗plicit 12:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Excel for Mac screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:PowerPoint for Mac screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Word for Mac screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Word 2010.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Microsoft Word for Mac 2011.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:MS Word 2007.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:R HAUGLAND.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Missing evidence of permission. May be restored anytime upon receipt of permission via OTRS -FASTILY 05:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a Do not move to Commons and the reason is that "OTRS or better link needed to verify license is correct.". Either we trust that the file is free or we do not. If we do not we should delete or use as fair use if relevant. MGA73 (talk) 18:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also see File:DRandOpor.jpg below. --MGA73 (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DRandOpor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other file (File:R HAUGLAND.jpg) by same user of the same person is suggested for deletion because copyright is unsure. I think same would apply here. (it does not look like a selfie) MGA73 (talk) 18:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Greg Bell in 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We do not have many photos of this person but it looks like a screenshot? If you think its okay then go ahead and move it to Commons. But there is no meta data so I'm not sure about this file. MGA73 (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:V.K.Rajwade.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and I'm not convinced that uploader is the original creator of the photo/drawing/painting. MGA73 (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DrKarl F Meyer.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is unused. Uploader may very well be the photographer but who is the photographer of the photo of the 2 men and who painted the painting? MGA73 (talk) 18:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TRNC border.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source is nicholashodder.com and that does not match the uploaders username. Only upload by the user that is not yet deleted. MGA73 (talk) 18:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AgnesFloodwall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. Its from 1972 and looks relevant enoug. But the author name does not match the username and the source is "Sunbury Municipal Authority" so no indication that uploader is the photographer. How do we know that "Sunbury Municipal Authority" license their photos GFDL? MGA73 (talk) 18:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vern Monnett at the Richie Hayward Benefit Novemver 4, 2009.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User have 2 uploads that are both unused. One have author Jungle Jim Beronas and the other author David Peralta. MGA73 (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vern Monnett Texas Tornados European Tour.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User have 2 uploads that are both unused. One have author Jungle Jim Beronas and the other author David Peralta. MGA73 (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fricke periodic table 172.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable {{PD-simple}} status, due to the shaded regions representing the number of valence electrons. Usage in Extended periodic table can be replaced by a user-created image like File:Fricke_periodic_table_172.svg. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.