Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 September 20

< September 19	September 21 >

September 20

File:CAT Annual Report 1997 Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No obvious use for this at Cambridge Antibody Technology and the logo might fall under Wikipedia:Non-free content. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:25, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mount Manipur Memorial.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn -FASTILY 03:10, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputing fair use rationale. Per c:COM:FOP India, 3D architecture and sculptures have FOP and thus, a free version of this monument can be recreated. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the fact that the image is not freely licensed at its source website, it is uploaded in English Wikipedia locally and not at Wikimedia Commons globally. It's a recently designed illustration. The actual work (building) is yet to be built. So, there's no actual photographs available to replace the illustration as of now. Hence, fair use rationale isn't disputed. --Haoreima (talk) 15:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See

Wikipedia:NFCC1. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I saw it. Yes, there's no free equivalent image available. --Haoreima (talk) 12:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

or could be created? The memorial still exists so a free image can still be created to depict it. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I have already said, The actual work (building) is yet to be built. There's no solid structure ready as of now. That's why graphic design is presented to the public by the designers in collaboration with the government. It's not even 1 month ago the design was released. --Haoreima (talk) 09:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry misread that. Withdrawing FFD nomination. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:49, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Time After Time (Cyndi Lauper vinyl).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The same European cover art was deleted in the

WP:NFCC, even after being deleted. I'm still unconvinced why visuals must come first before copyright enforcement. George Ho (talk) 15:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Laughter in the Rain - Neil Sedaka.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a

MOS:MUSIC#Images and notation. (A general discussion about various editions of 20th-century singles was made months ago, BTW.) George Ho (talk) 19:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Graham County Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F5 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

This non-free image is asserted to be the logo of Graham County, North Carolina. As best as I can tell, this image is actually just a home page graphic which appears on the home page of the the county's web site/ I can find nothing to substantiate that this is actually the logo for the county. The web site itself only uses on the home page as far as I can tell. I cannot find any uses of this purported logo. Fails

WP:V. Whpq (talk) 19:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Parton recordings of "I Will Always Love You"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep ogg file, delete the other. ✗plicit 23:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If deleting either one sample would detriment readers' understanding of the song, then how about keeping the MP3 sample that I uploaded instead? It illustrates what the original recording sounds like in 19 seconds, right? Furthermore, in contrast to the other .ogg one, which I nominated previously months ago, the .mp3 sample displays a partial verse and the partial chorus/refrain. That way, it enhances the idea that the song is more than just a well-known chorus/refrain made famous by the late Whitney Houston.

Nonetheless, if neither sample is necessary, and deleting them both wouldn't affect what can be already understood while reading the article, then deleting them both would be a fine alternative. (In general, sometimes I get irked by the idea that deleting a sample would severely affect readers' understanding, especially when a reader can recognize a singer's name and a song title, both of which are searchable. Furthermore, a reader can hear a song and use a mic via Google mobile app to recognize and find a random song. Once the song title is found, a reader can further learn more about the song itself in Wikipedia with or without a sample present.) George Ho (talk) 20:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ogg file that was nominated here less than three months ago and was closed as keep since there is enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion in the articles and no new arguments are made for its deletion. I do not think the mp3 file is an improvement enough to have it replace the ogg file. Aspects (talk) 23:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doug Bowser.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non free photo of a living person Masem (t) 21:11, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GrindstoneScreenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Affected:

Unused screenshot of non-free [1] software. Could possibly be used as fair use on Grindstone (time-tracking software). Ixfd64 (talk) 22:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.