Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 November 23

November 23

File:Taboo (video).jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very vague description about why does this frame "alludes to the theme" of the song, Low quality screenshot, possible

WP:NFCC#8

violation.

In my opinion it only serves as a decoration since there are other aspects of the Music Video that could easily serve as replacements if the article needs an image, such as the the use of Don Omar with Fast and Furious footage in the background. Hyperba21 (talk) 01:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hinkle misinformation.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook

WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded with sourced critical commentary explicitly discussing this image in-depth -FASTILY 09:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I do not believe this image meets

WP:NFCC#8, either. SWinxy (talk) 03:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

It's not just depicting tweets, it's also depicting the "added context" from Community Notes, as described in the usage caption, which isn't described in the referenced sentence, or others for that matter. Currently there is no easy way to accurately describe "how" contributors "add context" to tweets - what this looks like - without such a screenshot, for those who don't know what a Community Note is (most don't I assume).

The screenshot highlights the rare example of both a twitter user and community notes accusing Hinkle of misinformation, as a combination, and what that looks like. So it would harm their understanding of the level of Hinkle's misinformation without a doubt

WP:NFCC#8

.

Naturally, if there was a "context" variable for

WP:NFCC#1. I'll ask if this can be added though. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 08:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I've updated the file rationale, given it can be mistakenly construed as merely a quote tweet, in order to avoid any further misunderstandings. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 09:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing
WP:NFCC#1. Any of the desired context can be described with text even if that is currently present in the article. -- Whpq (talk) 03:57, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Black lotus.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove from Magic: The Gathering. ✗plicit 14:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remove from

WP:NFC#UUI #6. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@JJMC89: I'm fine with a speedy close, feel free to revert me and remove the rationale (only not doing myself because I'm unsure if this is allowed at FFD). I wasn't familiar with criteria 6. That said, I'd just like to say that criteria 6 is really dumb. Tank Man can't be used in the article on Tiannamen Square because it has its own article, but could be used if the article was deleted? Doesn't make sense, if there was a fair use argument without the separate article there should still be a fair use case with one. SnowFire (talk) 23:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mojang Studios logo 2020.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused local file superseded by better-quality replacement at Commons (c:File:Mojang Studios Logo (2020, wide).svg). IceWelder [✉] 11:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 06:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, @IceWelder: for future reference please use PROD for uncontroversial deletions like this. — MATRIX! (a good person!)_{[citation unneeded]} 20:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.