November 21

Lord Mayor's Cup (BRC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.161.84 (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Please provide reliable sources to support the claims you made above. Thanks. Tiggerjay (talk) 01:53, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tiggerjay, the OP refers to the report in the Brisbane Sunday Mail. That should be as reliable a source as is needed.

William, the place to ask for this change is on the Talk Page for the article: Talk:Lord Mayor's Cup (BRC). I've copied your request there. Rojomoke (talk) 05:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rojomoke somehow I missed the reference, thanks! Tiggerjay (talk) 21:54, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Just a quick question on my page Paul Rowley (broadcaster) What would you need me to add to it make make it reliable?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulrowley11 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• See
  WP:AUTOBIO for more information. However, in short we don't recommend people writing about themselves. Tiggerjay (talk) 01:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• I was, however able to find some sources and added them to the article. Tiggerjay (talk) 17:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference help requested. the comment refers to a referencing error, but did not state where the error occurred. I am first time editor. Please help by pointing out where the error occurred Thanks,

Djenkins bburg You appear to have fixed this with your edits at 01:26 and 01:29 on 16 November 2015. Rwessel (talk) 04:45, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Reference help requested. I don't understand the error I've apparently made. Thanks, HeyKurtz (talk) 02:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HeyKurtz The URL appears to have contained pipe characters, which confused the template parser (which uses pipes to separate parameters). I think the "&navid=DL|CAR|home" was just some URL rewriting done when the site was being navigated (and not otherwise needed), and I removed it. Please verify that the link is still to the correct web page. Rwessel (talk) 04:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference help requested. I am unsure what is the error in the reference. Thanks, Blamethemessenger (talk) 05:14, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blamethemessenger This was fixed by Quebec99 13:31, 3 March 2014. Rwessel (talk) 05:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference help requested. Hoping that these requests are linked to the issue that caused the request in the first place. Re. my page number error I cannot see the error on the actual page itself when I go into fix it. The error only appears to be bit where the error is highlighted. In a nutshell I think I had assumed I should also add in the total number of pages in book but perhaps this is not the case? Cheers Thanks, Blamethemessenger (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blamethemessenger This (as is the prior item) is an edit from last December, it was also subsequently fixed. Are you perhaps just noticing the year-old messages on your talk page? Rwessel (talk) 05:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And the referencing issue for

Mentalism (philosophy) from last December has also been fixed. Rwessel (talk) 05:33, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The "pages" field often causes confusion. It is an alternative to the "page" field, to be used (I think) when the passage you are citing covers more than one page. Maproom (talk) 09:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Wikipedia,

I would like to list me and my dance partner on Wikipedia. We were 7 times undefeated professional dance champions and 9 times world representatives.

South Africa have a lot of dance history but not a lot available to the people. Please advise.

Regards, Brian Schmidt & Meryl Williams — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Schmidt Ballroom (talk • contribs) 15:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a note on your talk page. HighInBC 17:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

... are the same person.

WP:MERGE should be done. DES ^(talk) 19:25, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

See

Occam's Razor by creating an absurdly complicated explanation. Situations like this, with multiple slightly different records that are clearly the same person, arise in genealogy all the time. It is true that none of the articles are well sourced. However, my opinion is that the various sources are consistent enough that they should be merged. (If there is a source that actually indicates that there were two people, they can be later split.) Robert McClenon (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

There must be a history book of the Confederacy that lists all of the members of their House of Representatives. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While

Second Confederate Congress are obviously not RS, they do list the representatives and senators of the Confederacy, and they all reference "The Historical Atlas of the Congresses of the Confederate States of America: 1861-1865, by Kenneth C. Martis (Simon and Schuster 1994)", which presumably *is* a RS. Looking at the WP articles, there is a "David Peter Lewis" listed in the Provisional Congress, a "John Wood Lewis, Sr." and a "David William Lewis" listed in the First, and no persons with the surname Lewis in the second. I would say that the odds of these articles being about different persons is negligible. Rwessel (talk) 06:56, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Childrens Theatre Company - regarding edit submitted by Cedar Riverside on November 21: what is needed for reference? My edit is based on extensive personal contacts and first-hand experience during that early period of the Moppet Players and Childrens Theatre history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedar Riverside (talk • contribs)

Hello @

citations to content that others have already published. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank You, David Silberman son of Jane Allen Loeb Sooy Ernest Loeb's oldest daughter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.53.153.131 (talk) 19:54, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken care of the issue. Thanks for noting this.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]