February 12

I used keyword "Quantum physicists" in https://petscan.wmflabs.org, then list of names appeared. In the list, Will Roper name showed up.

I visited that Will Roper, below category section I don't find "Quantum physicists" then why his name appeared ? Rizosome (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rizosome: Category:American string theorists is a sub-sub-sub-sub category of Category:Quantum physicists. -Arch dude (talk) 00:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Arch dude: How can you tell Category:American string theorists is a sub-sub-sub-sub category of Category:Quantum physicists? Rizosome (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rizosome: Go to Category:Quantum physicists and look at the subcategories section. 2C means 2 subcategories, and then you go from there down the rabbit hole. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 01:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rizosome: I went bottom-up, not top-down. I looked at the categories that Category:American string theorists is in (listed at the bottom of that page) and picked a next-level category that was likely to be within the tree from Category:Quantum physicists, and then kept going up toward the root. Either way works. I do not know a proper automated way to do it. -Arch dude (talk) 02:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some archive sites (e.g. Wikiwix) do not provide metadata re their archived documents. How does one satisfy the

@

Brycehughes: I'd suggest contacting them to ask, but when I go to the French contact page at http://archive.wikiwix.com/fr/contact or the English contact page at http://archive.wikiwix.com/en/contact, the text appears to be in Latin, and not necessarily be related to what should normally be on such a page (Syria and Palestine are mentioned, etc.). The .../get-it page is similarly bizarre. The copyright notice at the bottom of the pages is dated 2012. Anyone know what's going on here? —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 06:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Brycehughes (talk) 07:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Your example archive link doesn't work for me (ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS). The source is available at archive.org here. That snapshot url has a timestamp so perhaps use that instead?

—Trappist the monk (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

Brycehughes (talk) 13:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm trying to get a 'full text size' note, which looks like this [a] rather than the existing superscript type, [a]. How do I make such note? Thank you. CX Zoom (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CX Zoom, I'm rather doubtful that you can do that. Can I ask why the superscript is a problem for your use case? -- Fyrael (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fyrael: I am making the following template Template:Timeline of Nancy Pelosi's Political career, where notes [b] & [c] are a little bit out of sync due to it acting as a superscript. CX Zoom (talk) 17:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well that's quite a chart and unique issue. I'm afraid I don't personally have any advice, but maybe one of the even more experienced users here can help. -- Fyrael (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CX Zoom: for a case with only a few notes like this one, you can manually label the footnotes instead of auto-numbering. Then, you can use anchors.

Here is (I hope) an example:[[#anchor-a|[a]]]

{{anchor|anchor-a}} a: this is the first footnote

which renders as:

Here is (I hope) an example:[a]

a: this is the first footnote

-Arch dude (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an example with the caret :{{anchor|anchor-up-a}}[[#anchor-a|[a]]]

{{anchor|anchor-a}} [[#anchor-up-a|^]] a: this is the first footnote, with a caret

Which renders as:

Here is an example with the caret :[a]

^a: this is the first footnote

-Arch dude (talk) 20:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's traditional to use commas before descriptions on disambiguation pages, according to the Manual of Style. However, could anyone please tell me what to do if the link itself includes a comma?--Thylacine24 (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Thylacine24: Link it as normal. Is there a reason not to? You could pipe it, as described at that MOS page, if you think it needs it. RudolfRed (talk) 03:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RudolfRed: Thanks. Could you please tell me what you think of replacing the comma with a dash? I recently replaced a hyphen (used as a dash) on a disambiguation page where the link included a comma.--Thylacine24 (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Thylacine24: I would not agree with that. Link the name as it is, in my opinion. RudolfRed (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RudolfRed: Thanks. I did pipe another link on that disambiguation page that went to a section of another page, but I agree with you about otherwise not piping links on disambiguation pages, if that's what you're getting at. Could you please tell me if I'm understanding you correctly?--Thylacine24 (talk) 04:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

diff when you refer to an edit, or a link to any page you refer to or have in mind. You may think your question is clear and general with no need for an example but it nearly always helps. I first thought you were referring to a page name which ends in a comma. RudolfRed thought you were referring to not displaying the comma in the page name. We both guessed wrong based on [1]. I agree with your edit. PrimeHunter (talk) 08:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@PrimeHunter: Sorry about that. Could you please tell me if I should post the diff now, or just keep that in mind for the future?--Thylacine24 (talk) 12:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Thylacine24: I have posted the diff [2] now so you don't have to, but do remember it for the future. Helpers waste a lot of time trying to guess what a post is about, or replying based on a wrong guess. I have spent dozens of hours on it on this page. The editnotice includes: "If possible, please be specific in your question rather than general and link to any page or article your question involves, or at least tell us the title of the page." Some posters want us to edit a page but give no clue which page. Some posts aren't even about Wikipedia but don't say anything about it. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PrimeHunter: Thanks.--Thylacine24 (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello... i confused how to edit references section. references on this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Will_Always_Love_You on number 85 its my references pages. old url : http://www.wwwk.co.uk/music/hit-singles/years/1992.htm but my pages url was change, i had move my pages on here : https://www.wwwk.co.uk/blog/2021-02-11-No.-1-UK-Hit-Singles-of-1992.html?post_id=9 different cms framework make url has been changes. thanks you for yourhelp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khaossu (talk • contribs) 05:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khaossu, if you're using the visual editor, click on the reference, then Edit on the interface that pops up, and then click Change reference type in the lower-left. Paste your new URL and it should update when you click Generate then Insert. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hie everybody,

This is Rupesh, I am working for an Ad agency and we are looking to create a Wikipedia page for our company. I am totally new to the content editing for wikipedia I hope someone will help me our here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupeshlotsblue (talk • contribs) 06:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

edit requests so that uninvolved editors can add or change the information for you, provided you have reliable sources that support those claims. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 07:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The other thing to note, Rupeshlotsblue is that if Wikipedia eventually has an article ahbout your company, it will not belong to your company, your company will have no control over what the article contains, and it should be almost entirely based on what published sources unconnected with you say about you, even if you do not like what they say. See An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. --ColinFine (talk) 12:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:AMOUNT. We delete about 200 articles each day due to lack of notability. -Arch dude (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi! I'm Dswitz10734, an editor here on Wikipedia. I was wondering if it is acceptable to put a YouTube link to the official song if the article is about that song. Can anybody help? Dswitz10734 (talk) 15:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dswitz10734, as long as it's something like this [3] and not an anonymous upload, I think it's ok for the EL section. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a tool or category out there for WikiGnomes to track and fill in refs that are just bare URLs? -- Fyrael (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REFILL can fill in stuff. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I was actually looking for something similar to the other tasks at Wikipedia:Task Center, though I wouldn't be shocked to learn there's no such thing for this type of activity. I appreciate the link though; I'll definitely use in future. -- Fyrael (talk) 16:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fyrael I guess you can take a look at [4]... Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The actual results for that are kind of fascinating, haha. Thanks. -- Fyrael (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fyrael, Gråbergs Gråa Sång I just stumbled upon this Wikipedia:ProveIt. I haven't tried to use it but it might help. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 18:18, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fyrael: Try Category:Articles with bare URLs for citations. GoingBatty (talk) 04:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm a youtuber and someone has made a wikipedia page about me which details my full name (which I have never released online) and it references my limited company (also not public knowledge) so people are finding my home address. Is there anything I can do to have the page removed??? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LDShadowLady — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.191.101 (talk) 17:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the offending information from the page on the grounds that the source cited for it fails

problem solving 17:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

New AfD opened which looks like a snow delete. Google has indexed the personal info so I gave feedback to request a reindex. Not sure how quickly they will respond, if at all. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I attended a boy scout jamboree in winston salem,n.c. at whitaker park 1965 and its not listed anywhere am i dreaming or what why 0 record of this jamboree? there were 1000's of scouts there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8080:8C01:2600:AC2F:EB0:393A:6916 (talk) 20:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find a source and show that it was a notable event, then there's no reason why you can't add it yourself. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jamboree lists several articles on various type of scouting jamborees. Are you sure it isn't mentioned in any of them? —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 00:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While national and international jamborees probably meet Wikipedia:Notability (events) for their own article, there could be many smaller jamborees that would not. If it's a regular event (or the 1965 jamboree was special in some way), and you can find independent reliable sources, maybe it could be added to Scouting in North Carolina. GoingBatty (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Help Desk,

I wanted to bring your attention to the fact that the information in the women in Pakistan armed forces is not complete as it doesn't include the women serving in the Armed forces nursing service. It is missing information and doesn't reflect the real information as hundred of woman in the group are serving in the army navy and airforce and no mention of it is not fair.

Article : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_Pakistan_Armed_Forces — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammad Ali Farooq (talk • contribs) 20:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

[ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

This is more of a style question. CinemaScope has a lot of terms in quotations. It looks to me like most of them should not be in quotes, but I don't know. Can someone look at the article and make changes, if needed? Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 22:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bubba73: If you think something doesn't look right, you can always change it yourself. If someone disagrees, you can discuss on the talk page. As it turns out, I looked at the article and found some (but not all) of the excessive quotes distracting and non-encyclopedic as well, so I removed them. 23:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)}[reply]

Thank you. I wanted someone with more expertise to look at it. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 00:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There were a lot more discussions on this page, and it looks like some IP users keep removing them (without archiving). And they also modify other people's comments. What should we do about it? --fireattack (talk) 22:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Folks! I was looking at this French article on fr Wikipedia [[5]]. Is the first reference normal or is that a spam URL? It is hard to tell. It looks like a spam URL, although could be wrong. Is it some kind of archive service. Does anybody know what's with http://archive.wikiwix.com/ What is it? Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 23:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, scope creep. I don't know, but there was another question on this page about wikiwix about 12 hours ago, which seemed to be saying it was an archive service. --ColinFine (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ColinFine: I did see that on a lot of French articles, that I was perhaps thinking of translating. It is mentioned in a few places:[6] as a search engine. Does anybody have any clue regarding the the spam URL. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 20:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]