Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Fastly
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Already redirected . To the mainspace article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Fastly
- )
Completing the nomination for an IP that says Fails
WP:COMPANY
, read likes an ad. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:7191:7D1F:2C3:4FA2 (talk) 18:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC) as posted on MfD talk.
Page was days away from G13, so abandoned. Legacypac (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- The IPs statement is unsupportable. Plausibly notable, easily verified, does not particularly read like an ad. Is this some sort of game? —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:40, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- The statement is fixed to "G13-soon draft, claims to fail subject's notability guidelines." but it not done. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:117B:604A:818E:8B70 (talk) 07:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I completed an MfD (tagged as such) as housekeeping matter. Legacypac (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- It’s yet another webservices company, but was reasonably written by an experienced wikipedian who declared his COI. I am not sure whether it passes WP:CORP. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:10, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Neutral - There probably is some sort of game with the IP nomination. I don't know what the game is. Revenge, maybe. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:21, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- It does says "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue." so it does not pass the test. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:117B:604A:818E:8B70 (talk) 07:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- You have clearly been on Wikipedia before. I suspect some game afoot. Your current IP is not your usual IP/account. Second accounts are not allowed to be used in project space, you are ]
- It does says "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue." so it does not pass the test. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:117B:604A:818E:8B70 (talk) 07:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
I only transferred this over as a housekeeping matter, as I've done before. This is weird. I think we should close this with no action. Legacypac (talk) 09:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.