Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kryptomon

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. plicit 14:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kryptomon

Draft:Kryptomon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Crypto/NFT spam draft created by now-CU blocked user. Likely UPE with mainspace equivalent Kryptomon having been G11'd after creation by a different, now-blocked account. Uhai (talk) 21:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Keep - Needs rejecting or declining. Not quite promotional enough to warrant deletion at MFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Creator was blocked for paid editing. Clearly made for promotional reasons. Wikipedia is not bought and sold, therefore this should be deleted. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 22:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Looks like a nicely cleaned up draft on a non-notable subject. Edits that removed the worst stuff also removed all need for special consideration to be given to this page.—Alalch E. 15:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Absolutely not ready to be published due to notability issues, but I'm indifferent on whether we delete it now or in 6 months with a G13. Sergecross73 msg me 20:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Do not use MfD to curate draftspace, unless there is tendentious resubmission or resubmission after reject. Do not attempt to clerk SPI at MfD, unless you’re an SPI clerk. Leave for G13, G13 exists for these, and bringing stuff like this to MfD is a net negative. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    See what I said at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sonatafy Technology: this was brought here for UPE. Uhai (talk) 19:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    See my answer there. Draftspace deletion has no benefit, and a downside of clearing records of their inept UPEditing allowing them a clean restart. Better to let it sit live fir six months. SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Zxcvbnm. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 06:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.