Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Luxy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Luxy
It's safe to say 3 submissions have not actually improved this, certainly not beyond better for our policies, given the sources are spanning to where they're simply placeholding, not actually offering notability; our policies have been linked and there's been no openly stated acknowledgements, since one of the first ones shown is "No Advertising". SwisterTwister talk 03:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. User did leave a message on my talk page after last review but article still has not been improved to comply. Triptothecottage (talk) 07:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: bordering on ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.