Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:RedSeal, Inc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep but Thefunkygibbon needs to address the problems liste.d CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:03, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:RedSeal, Inc

While I know that the author of this page is doing their best, seven declines in two weeks is a bit much, and indicates that this company might not actually be notable. Primefac (talk) 05:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The author might just be jumping the gun.—Eat me, I'm an azuki (talk · contribs · email) 10:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes, I'm probably jumping the gun. I'm trying very hard to correct the problems. Still failing to see how comments such as "Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: We need to see third party coverage that shows notability, press releases and earnings reports are not enough. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)" can be at all correct when looking through the 21 references currently on the article, 9 are what i would consider "press releases/earnings reports" the rest are articles relating to awards won, reviews, and other talk of the company. Comments such as "Sulfurboy's" do nothing but make me feel that he has not even checked any of the references before declining. I hope he has, but you must be able to see from my point of view when something is 40% of something you don't imply that it is 100% Thefunkygibbon (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'd say you have five different opinions there so maybe they do have a point. Multiple sources announcing fundraising is nice but not the point. The fact that you don't have any sources for the product or partners section is telling. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Telling of what, exactly? I can point to the documentation or the webpage where it refers to the partners or the product.. sorry, i'm not sure what it is you're getting at. Also, only 3 users made note of notablity. the others mentioned "advertising" and copywrite and not enough details about the company. Thefunkygibbon (talk) 16:39, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.