Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ringed topos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . Anyone is free to move this to main. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ringed topos

talk | history | links | watch | logs

)

Math draft up for G13. No work done in over three years. Effort to Redirect it 6 months back was. reversed as "vandalism". If abandoned or no longer required, it should be deleted. If of some use for merge, it should be redirected again until an editor is actively working on it. Legacypac (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: This is a notable topic. It is a subtopic of topos but just as we have ringed space in addition to topological space, the topic seems to deserve a standalone-article treatment. -- Taku (talk) 07:18, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The section about sheaves of ${\displaystyle E_{n}}$-rings is awkwardly incomplete, but if it were either cut completely or filled out more, we'd have a respectable stub here.
  talk) 17:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  If the other editors want to comment out that section (which is not essential), move the draft to the mainspace and then add that section back when it becomes more complete, I can be on board with that. -- Taku (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll withdraw in favor of a proper move to mainspace. Legacypac (talk) 04:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.