Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sekai (Daikin)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Sekai (Daikin)
The draft was a 5-month old abandoned draft that was suddenly
Wikipedia:CORPDEPTH. Matthew hk (talk) 02:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
]
- Delete - All of the work on this draft appears to be the work of questionable unregistered editors. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - G13 will catch it eventually. If not, no harm is done. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 00:40, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep. Editing it to defer G13 is how it’s meant to work. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:34, 11 May 2019 (UTC) New !vote below, I see that authors are not being cooperative. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:41, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- The edits were re-adding (spam) external links, dummy edit and deleting AFC comments to make it look likes a genuine article instead of draft. Somehow this draft was appeared in wiki mirror in everybodywiki, but for the merit of non-notable (hoax) subsidiary of Daikin and the concern of other hoaxes added by the draft creator (such as creating Draft:Panasonic Adventure Time, a hoax crossover of Panasonic and Adventure Time), i don't see any chance this draft would be improved to a level that it would be ever accepted as notable firm. Matthew hk (talk) 06:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- The recent edits: Special:Diff/896355853, Special:Diff/896355968. Also, the ext link was for an Indonesian company called "Sekai ", but no sign it was a subsidiary of Daikin as claimed by this draft. Matthew hk (talk) 08:27, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Matthew hk (talk) 06:08, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:CORP, at least not from this beginning. Messy history is not worth the trouble. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)]
- Comment: SmokeyJoe, unless I'm missing something, you've !voted keep and delete. SITH (talk) 12:53, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT. Article still has promotional tone and is unsourced. We don't need to hear about their employee training programs. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)]
- Note that Sekai is mentioned in the main Daikin article as a competitor and later acquisition, so Daikin suffices to cover this company turned subsidiary. This is assuming the verbiage about it being acquired can be verified. If it is a hoax, it should be removed from those sections. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:12, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.