Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Specialization (algebraic geometry)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . No problem restoring if drafter wants the content to merge somewhere else. ♠PMC(talk) 01:11, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Specialization (algebraic geometry)

Draft:Specialization (algebraic geometry) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Three words and reference. Abandoned math topic Legacypac (talk) 10:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is an important concept; there are the references but more can/should be added, in addition to actual development of the draft. — Taku (talk) 11:09, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- this draft has no actual content and has been abandoned for almost three years. It's clear this draft will never be an article and, if there is an encyclopedia article to be written on the topic, this would only obstruct efforts to write it. Reyk YO! 10:17, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - In its current state, this is crud. Can always be re-created. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Starting from scratch would not actually be harder than building on this draft, so we don't really need the draft. We could, I suppose, add "specialization" to the glossary of algebraic geometry with a definition in a few sentences, and attach the references given here to that. XOR'easter (talk) 16:19, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I thought that there was supposed to be an interaction ban stopping Legacypac doing anything with Taku. This should include trying to arrange deletion. Anyway this page has potential. There is no deadline, and deleting this makes sure that it will take even longer. (an alternative could be to userfy) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am not under an IBAN with Taku. Please strike that. Legacypac (talk) 06:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.