Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Malaysian expressway system

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 00:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Malaysian expressway system

I'm not convinced it's a broad enough area for a portal, it's mainly the domain of one user, User:Aiman abmajid, whom I have attempted to contact but from whom I have had no response, [1]. A clean up tag was added and swiftly reverted. I'm bringing it here to get a community consensus on whether the topic merits a portal. Hiding talk 09:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I don't think this merits being a portal. It looks like all of the content already exists in the article space (primarily
  Malaysian expressway system and Road signs in Malaysia). —Doug Bell ^{talk•contrib} 09:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Not broad enough for a portal. Most of the content could be merged into the
  Malaysian expressway system article, though. Very nice page, but too specific. --TantalumTelluride 20:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Article-worthy, not portal worthy. I've proposed a speedy deletion
  T
  21:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The articles mentioned above already deal with the subject effectivly, no need for the portal. Death Eater Dan (Muahaha) 09:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete--
  talk 05:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per above --larsinio (poke)^(prod)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.