Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:New Caledonia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:18, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:New Caledonia

Delete Similar to

WP:POG guideline. Portal:France can cover this more than adequately. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete due to the fact that the subject of this portal is not important enough to qualify for its own portal. Rlin8 (☎·✎·📧) 23:13, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Portal has average 3 daily pageviews. Lead article has average 2253 daily pageviews. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - But do not necessarily agree that the subject is not important enough. An overseas collectivity of France is a first-level administrative subdivision, like a state of the United States or of India, except that France is a unitary republic, so that subdivisions are not fully self-governing, as in India or the US. Therefore without prejudice. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:46, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: could be broad enough, but it currently isn't. Doesn't have active maintenance, per
WP:PORTAL. SITH (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per noninator. Narrow topic, fails the
WP:POG requirement that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:13, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.