Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DÜNGÁNÈ/Off Wiki Forums

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Deleted per DÜNGÁNÈ's permission--v/r - TP 03:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:DÜNGÁNÈ/Off Wiki Forums

User:DÜNGÁNÈ/Off Wiki Forums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:Hound or whatever. Not sure what the dude is up to. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 22:05, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS:Go to unblanked version. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete - I asked D to get this deleted; instead he blanked it. But it would be better deleted. I couldn't be bothered to raise the MFD, but now GPM has, it should just go (as should User:DÜNGÁNÈ/Report ANI) William M. Connolley (talk) 21:22, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete both as these kinds of pages only serve to disparage and threaten other users and have no beneficial purpose to the encyclopedia. If DÜNGÁNÈ chooses to track Gun Powder Ma's activities or actions, then I suggest he store it on his computer.--v/r - TP 22:17, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If those pages are considered violation of policy, I give permission for an admin (you) to delete them without waiting for the process to be complete.DÜNGÁNÈ (talk) 02:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both For convenience, here are links to the pre-blanked pages: Off Wiki Forums and Report ANI. Each of these is clearly an attack page against an editor and so fails
    WP:UP#POLEMIC. While there will be disagreements between editors, and it will occasionally be necessary to build an evidence page for imminent use on a noticeboard, these pages are simply unhelpful as consisting of random points that are considered to reflect negatively on an editor—Wikipedia is not the place for that. Johnuniq (talk) 01:52, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.