Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:John C. Huang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep, nom withdrawn Cenarium (talk) 12:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:John C. Huang

This user page is blatant

• Speedy keep
  WP:NOR only applies to the article space. Most of our content in the project and user namespaces would likely be considered original research. -- Ned Scott 05:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Comment – It is certainly not true that NOR applies only to article space:

t c 07:07, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:NOR does not say anywhere that it doesn't apply to userspace, and it doesn't limit its scope anywhere. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen long standing consensus (as well as it being common sense) that WP:NOR is not meant to be seen in the same light on project pages as it is in the article space. It's a big giant "no duh" situation. Like I said, the vasty majority of our content in user and project namespace would be considered OR by

WP:NOR. Let's not be silly here. -- Ned Scott 06:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Also, this: Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines/Archive 2#policies?. -- Ned Scott 06:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - there is nothing of major concern here, it is not an article mainspace, and many userpages are filled with
  WP:OR has little relevance on deleting a users page. If anything, it would be cleaner to use something like {{Template:Userpage}}. Tiggerjay (talk) 15:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep This is userspace, so
  Userpage}} would clear up any confusion. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 16:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - The best way of dealing with this contributor's talk page disruptions is trough wp:Administrator intervention against vandalism. - DVdm (talk) 16:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – I would be happy to keep this user page if AIV were effective here. A report there was removed after 45 minutes, perhaps in the mistaken belief that NOR doesn’t apply to talk pages. —

t c 19:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment - I think the report was removed for stale because after a

wp:NOR after last warning. Cheers, DVdm (talk) 08:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Not at this point The user is active, let's see how the situation evolves. The page is not really harmful, though a notice may be a good idea. If the user is happy with this userpage, then we just have to hope that constructive contributions will follow and he'll reconsider the content at some point. If it's getting out of hands and it's used for
  soap boxing, then deletion would be appropriate. Cenarium (talk) 00:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment - Thanks for let me keep my userpage. From now on, I will just edit my userpage until I have my idea published by some formal magazine. Recently, I just found out a problem in the Michelson-Morley experiment. That problem caused null result. I believe that all the major components are ready to remove Lorentz transformation. I will use my userpage to report them, step by step. John C. Huang (talk) 03:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw nomination – I am satisfied with the user’s comment above. His agreement not to post his theory except on his user page resolves the reason for my nomination. I request that the MfD be closed. —
  t c 09:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.