Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lihaas/India and state sponsored terrorism
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:42, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
User:Lihaas/India and state sponsored terrorism
Per
WP:STALEDRAFT not a single edit since the article was userfied. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
]
- Delete It is a preferred version of disputed content, and clearly eligible for deletion. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep A valid userspace draft which the user is entitled to edit or do with whatever he/she wishes. There is no such thing as a deadline for editing. Mar4d (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- It is not a valid userspace draft at all, per WP:STALEDRAFT "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content." Darkness Shines (talk) 17:02, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete
Keep(see below) - The page was userified 02:58, 26 August 2012.[1]WP:STALEDRAFT sets an unspecified time limit through language such as "should not be used to indefinitely host pages", "long-term archival purposes", and "Short-term hosting." With no meaningful effort to get the page into article space, that time limit is about three months. Come back to MfD on 27 November 2012. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 03:36, 7 October 2012 (UTC)]
- I didn't consider the content. The AfD close noted "sourcing and POV of this article make it unfit for inclusion in the project."[2] Trouble content + little effort to improve accelerates the WP:STALEDRAFT time limit. Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 03:45, 7 October 2012 (UTC)]
- I didn't consider the content. The AfD close noted "sourcing and POV of this article make it unfit for inclusion in the project."[2] Trouble content + little effort to improve accelerates the WP:STALEDRAFT time limit. Delete per
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.