Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Max808/Liz Sloan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Max808/Liz Sloan

WP:STALEDRAFT of an article previously deleted in 2011. Wouldn't survive given that only source is a personal blog Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Is it a copy of the article that was deleted? If so, delete, otherwise keep because STALEDRAFT isn't met. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 03:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: Dave Schwep has an article, of which this seems to be a copy. Liz Sloan had an article but it was deleted some time ago. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does "seems to be" mean? Whether it's a copy is the basis for my !vote. Barring unusual circumstances, users are allowed to create drafts of topics which have previously been deleted -- just not copies of the articles. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Crud by long-departed user. (Someone may say that we should leave this in case the long-departed user comes back.) Robert McClenon (talk) 14:59, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.