Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep because I like it – and also because April Fool's is over.‎ InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 13:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

Where do i even begin, this article has so many problems that I dont even know where to begin

firstly as the nominatonator I say Delete as per nom
since I am the only one who voted so far and I say delete
This is unencylopedic
There aren't any source in this article so it must not be notable
Does not pass
WP:GNG
No sources so no notability ofc
This won the award for the worst wikipedia policy of 2023
Not even an actual policy so delete
I also dont like it, infact I hate it, its the worst wikipedia policy ever
It's not interesting at all obiviously since i dont like it
It also adds zero value to this site
Very harmful forcing people to do stuff so Delete
This article is too funny to a point its actually stupid
Besides I don't even get the point of the joke
I dont like the format
This article is rubbish
Only sources are offline
Creator hasn't been online in years
Its an orphan (i think)
Given its a bad policy this article will prob get vandalised
Its simply just not notable
Delete as a google search reveals that I can only anything about this policy on wikipedia (.ie this article)
18 years old and this article still looks incredibly bad no hope of it existing in the future
This isn't a real policy anymore so delete
Less than 100 views a day according to page view despite being a policy lame delete it
as of right now I am the only voter and I say delete and majority rules
Not enough editors (i think)
this policy has never appeared in the news or existed anywhere on earth outside wikipedia
maybe like 20 people have used this policy before
My friends dont know about it so Delete
This wikipedia policy is a crystal ball clearly
Not once source could i find (other than wikipedia) where this policy is indeed real
Delete nobody has ever added sources to this article
no interwiki
I bet a similar article got deleted I dont know
A bunch of other articles in probably also got deleted
Delete this isn't a guideline only a bad essay
I dont know, creator is bad I think
4th nomination already people want it deleted
Delete if this gets kept i will never come back again
This article is an insult to us fellow wikipedians
WP:ILIKE
is not a valid argument
the arguments for keeping do not exist yet

therefore it should be deleted NotOrrio (talk) 04:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)^{[April Fools!]}[reply]

Delete as people do not obey this. Toadette ^{(April Fools Day!)} 06:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Opal|zukor^(discuss) 15:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom astral ▪️ he/him ▪️ >:3 17:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because I don't like it. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 22:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.