Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of Wikimedia Projects and Wikias

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 22:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was nominated on AFD, moving here. Nominator's comments below. Stifle (talk) 00:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's some crazy way of uniting Wikimedia and Wikia projects, but you have to dance through a hoop first. It's completely ridiculous. Why don't we throw Yahoo Groups and Myspace accounts into the mix, a unite the whole darn web. We have meta to communicate within Wikimedia, Wikia is seperate, and it's fine that way. -- Zanimum 15:04, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• well, someone has to say this - Delete per nom. Purpose is unclear, and, yeah, we have meta for communication/coordination between Wikimedia projects. FreplySpang (talk) 12:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Been a while since a page has given me a resounding "what the heck is going on in here?" feeling. The title is a bit funny (as nom says), but the article is even weirder: Proposed policy? Membership roster with one name? Joining the "project" - to what end? Basically, this article is misnamed, has a strange structure, and it's also redundant - there already are lists of Wikimedia projects and Wikia projects... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 13:06, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete per wwwolf. Honestly, I have no idea what this supposed to mean. Why would a "list of projects" have a section for member-editors? Very confusing (and confused) page. Xoloz 13:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. What's a "Wikia" anyway? Was that a typo for "wiki"? Jet Engines 14:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikia is the new name for the old Wikicities. Visit them to learn about the fun! Xoloz 15:38, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Interesting! Fomz 20:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. 172.145.236.192 16:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete. Title was misleading (I actually thought it was a valid page), but once looking at it, i realized it must be deleted. It's promising, but just not good enough to be a page, much less a policy. WikiPrez 21:43, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom & wwwwolf. Timrem 21:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• What the heck is going on in there indeed. I have no clue how the page would work, nor what it purpose is; I also doubt that asking users to have to go through that page is going to match the Foundation's issues nor is going to help Wikia in the long run. Delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 02:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.