Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Victor Mochere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete as copyvio, no response from page creator. The page can always be resurrected with original content. —Soap— 12:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Victor Mochere

Plagiarized from Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Singularity42, see also Special:Contributions/Victor Mochere. Since he hasn't transcluded it onto RfA yet, nobody can oppose on the page yet. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:58, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Would this be considered a copyvio, given there's no attribution to the original source? How about for the contents of File:Victor_Mochere.jpg which Google Image Search shows a number of identical matches, including one ostensibly from 2009? - Ionek (talk) 02:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, yes, and I've CSD'd the file. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Since it was made today, it's wholly possible, I'd even say likely, that he's simply using the template, with thoughts of personalizing it later. It seems to me that the best course of action would be a conversation with the User, specifically about the role of adminship, and try to discern what was meant by the edit. Seems less
BITE-y to me then just deleting this page. Achowat (talk) 02:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment and request. As the editor whose contributions have been copied without attribution, I've left a comment on the user's talk page. If the editor edits again without responding or 24 hours goes by without any changes, I would ask for the page to be speedy deleted under
WP:G12. (I won't do it myself as I'm guessing one could argue I'm involved as the person whose work was copied.) Singularity42 (talk) 11:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.