Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Ladakh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Ladakh

Wikipedia:WikiProject Ladakh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A dead or probably never-alive WikiProject. All the interlinked articles have been edited only by me and FlyJet777, except few minor edits by other editors to correct wrong transclusions of templates/categories. The WikiProject surely doesn't really seem useful as there has been no collaboration by other editors, which happens to be the purpose of having a WikiProject in first place. It was created in February 2020 and 7-8 months is a good period for editors to give chance to revive the project. Seems that such thing has not happened. In fact I don't even think this Project was even created by consulting multiple editors. Seems to be just one man army working here and Project is not needed for one single (now two) editor. Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 18:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: Instead of creating WikiProjects about subregions of Kashmir, I suggest renaming Wikipedia:WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir to Wikipedia:WikiProject Kashmir and creating task forces under the Project for the subregions. --Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 18:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - as a subproject of WP:WikiProject India. The parentage on the page suggests that it is a subproject, but the articles have been getting tagged as being handled by a separate WikiProject (see Talk:Ladakh for example. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete whether as a subproject or as its own project, two people do not a project make. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep as a subproject. No harm done in having miniature subprojects at the state level (and a union territory is at the state level). Robert McClenon (talk) 03:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and mark with {{WikiProject status|draft}}. Not an implausible thing that could be developed in the future and with the appropriate tag the page would not be misleading. — Bilorv (talk) 00:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.