Wikipedia:Peer review/High-Definition Multimedia Interface/archive1

High-Definition Multimedia Interface

I would like to get user comments before nominating this article for FAC. It has a great intro paragraph but maybe it should be split up into sections in the main part of the article? Any other comments are appreciated. Blackjack48 16:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found lead incomphresible to a lay person. I except such an article will contain technical details that make my eyes glaze over, but not in the lead. Why was this developed? What caused these companies to partner up for this? Has the partnership done anything else besides this interface? What is the significance of compressed or uncompressed streams? You also need to convert all the bullet points to prose. --Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 18:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 16:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• External links need to be converted to inline citations. Likewise, you're gonna need more of them to take the article anywhere. Seegoon 14:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]