Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 2

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:England Tour1899.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Published in 1954: not PD. No evidence provided by uploader it was first published before 1923. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the face of it this is an offical team portrait and overwhelmingly likely to have been published anonymously shortly after it was taken. Can I prove that? No. But it'd be dim to delete this over mere copyright paranoia. A reasonable case for fair use could be made I think. Public domain, no matter your degree of paranoia, no later than 2024. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erdman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source information is insufficient to show that this picture is in the public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:07, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn - PD-ineligible/PD-text. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ethanol.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is http://wetche.cmbi.ru.nl/vwo/molmodels.html; I see no reason to believe this is PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn - PD-ineligible/PD-text. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:19, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ethanol3d.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source site is down, and I see no reason to believe this is GFDL. Uploader has at least one other image that was mistagged as free (see above). Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:34, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:First Hussite King.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Published in 1923, thus not PD in the US where it must be PD in order for WP to host it. Unless we can prove {{PD-US-not renewed}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alphonse Mucha died in 1939, therefore 70 years pma term expired on 1 January 2010. If you absolutely must delete this from here, don't: move it to Commons and tag as {{PD-old-70}}, {{PD-art}} and {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:12, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons will delete the image as well: Commons:COM:L#Interaction_of_United_States_copyright_law_and_non-US_copyright_law. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a difference between "if the URAA is upheld, they may all be deleted" (exact words on Commons) and "will delete this image" (your paraphrase), as can be seen from the fact that there are around 2500 files in commons:Category:Works copyrighted in the U.S. and commons:Category:Works possibly copyrighted in the U.S.. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:35, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And having searched the US copyright renewal records on Google, there's no renewal for this painting, not that it ever seemed likely that there would be. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why I said {{US-not renewed}}, as it's not a criterion for international works: [1].Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:53, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Author identity has been clarified by DragonflySixtyseven. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foerster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not enough information provided about this image to prove it's PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ignác Šechtl died in 1911; therefore, all photos he took are now public domain. DS (talk) 23:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frank keenan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source doesn't make it clear if this is PD or not. Source appears to be http://www.silentsaregolden.com/photos2/frankkeenanphoto.html, but has changed photo since uploaded by user. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fraenkel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source doesn't have enough information for us to prove if this is PD or not. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: marked fair use. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:George Edalji.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is down; I see no indication this is PD in US. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use case could be made, likely in any case from the appearance of the subject to be a pre-1939 UK anonymous or corporate work in which case it would be {{PD-UK}}. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:22, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I changed this to a Fair use claim to facilitate the closing of this discussion. Since the source is a broken like I don't think uploader could ever prove it wsa a pre-1939 UK anonymous work.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 21:20, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newspaper photo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• tagged as PD-self, but sourced to school - website link dead Skier Dude (talk 04:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewburyAcademyLogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo, tagged as PD-self; sourced to school (link is dead) Skier Dude (talk 04:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GFI FENICS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• orphaned; corporate logo; no source, most likely not CC Skier Dude (talk 04:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Live - Under the Covers 2004.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder if image is legit Skier Dude (talk 04:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escape Without Injury Cover 2002.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder if image is legit Skier Dude (talk 04:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:She Turns To Gold Cover 1999.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder if image is legit Skier Dude (talk 04:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Segue Debut Album 1998.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder if image is legit Skier Dude (talk 04:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sweet Solia 2003.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be album cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder if image is legit Skier Dude (talk 04:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gegoodending.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be cover for manga for User:KrebMarkt/GE – Good Ending - if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Genesis P and Me Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder if image is legit Skier Dude (talk 04:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinmaine-ia 100.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• publicity poster for Twin Galaxies - no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Including File:Empire 100.jpg File:Spacewar 100.jpg File:Planetcomicon 100.jpg File:Midwestgaming-from-c100.jpg File:Donkeykongchampionwiebe 100.jpg File:Poster state teams tournment 05.jpg for the same reason

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gujarati Comedy Group Logo-circle.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HKGolferCover1008b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• magazine cover; doubtful uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HKGolferCover1006b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• magazine cover; uploader here claims to be the publisher - no OTRS or other proof of CC release Skier Dude (talk 04:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HKGolferCover1004b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• magazine cover; uploader here claims to be the publisher - no OTRS or other proof of CC release Skier Dude (talk 04:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helmet trop.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• contains football team logo that is not de minimis - no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helmet mata.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• contains football team logo that is not de minimis - no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helmet marsh.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• contains football team logo that is not de minimis - no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helmet drag.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• contains football team logo that is not de minimis - no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holy Trinity University - Palawan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pole chudes caricature.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No indication of release into free. The source URL is a forum where people post whatever they pinch wherever. Bar-abban (talk) 04:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imrul Kayes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• web resolution, no metadata, unusual cropping (note black line on left), no source, appears to be taken from another source Skier Dude (talk 05:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inferior Symphony .jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be album cover from one of the multiple deleted band articles from this uploader - no source - if legit, uploader wouldn't be (c) holder, if not, no need to retain here Skier Dude (talk 05:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inferior symphony re-issue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be album cover from one of the multiple deleted band articles from this uploader - no source - if legit, uploader wouldn't be (c) holder, if not, no need to retain here Skier Dude (talk 05:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ftg band 1996.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be publicity shot for band - watermarked KH, can see no link to uploader holding (c) from that Skier Dude (talk 05:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Modar 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be album cover from one of the multiple deleted band articles from this uploader - no source - if legit, uploader wouldn't be (c) holder, if not, no need to retain here Skier Dude (talk 05:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barisal Blazers Lose a wicket.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• web resolution, no metadata, unusual cropping (note black lines on left & right), no source, appears to be taken from another source Skier Dude (talk 05:11, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sultans of Sylhet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• team logo - no source - unlikely uploader is (c) Holder Skier Dude (talk 05:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kings of Khulna.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• team logo - no source- unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 05:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cyclones of Chittagong.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• team logo - no source - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 05:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barisal Blazers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• team logo - no source - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 05:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dhaka Dynamites.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• team logo - no source - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 05:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RPWL Kiss The Sun Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 05:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angela1988.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• from the odd pixelization I'd guess this is a screenshot, metadata is from Paint, not camera - no source other than "I took this" Skier Dude (talk 05:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghs1929.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I don't see uploader has provided proper evidence that this has fallen into the public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the description is accurate, this is {{PD-Canada}}. "All photographs taken before 1 January, 1949 are in the public domain." Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:28, 15 September 2010 (UTC) *Slaps head*. Here CA is California, not Canada. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glendale high.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source page says All Rights Reserved. Unless it can be applied under {{CAGov}}, which IANAL but doesn't appear to be the case. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:05, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green Lanes 1930.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I see no proof this is public domain, the license is incorrect. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any corporate or anonymous work created in the UK in the 1930s is {{PD-UK}}. It is likely, but not certain, that this falls into that category. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand hotel NY.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is not specific enough to establish PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guerra.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I see no evidence this is PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HabibullahKhwaja.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is to vague to determine PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hanjar div Himmler Sauberzw.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Improper license by uploader, no evidence provided for PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miley-cyrus-grammy-awards-2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image source is listed as "Wikipedia Indonesia" with no author information. The file's entry at the Indonesian Wikipedia (id:Berkas:Miley-cyrus-grammy-awards-2010.jpg) includes a warning that I do not understand but it appears to lack required information there too. As such, the licensing information seems dubious. It should go without saying that if the uploader does hold copyright for this image, he or she should be able to provide author information. AussieLegend (talk) 07:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has since uploaded an identical version of this image as File:Grammy-awards-2010.jpg with a {{Non-free album cover}} license, which it clearly is not. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arab Project.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source for any of the images used to verify that they were released under a free license. Uploader is currently subject to a contributor copyright investigation. — ξ^xplicit 07:41, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arabs.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source for any of the images used to verify that they were released under a free license. Uploader is currently subject to a contributor copyright investigation. — ξ^xplicit 07:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arabs.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source for any of the images used to verify that they were released under a free license. Uploader is currently subject to a contributor copyright investigation. — ξ^xplicit 07:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

File:Massagers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a professional product photo. Eeekster (talk) 07:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy deleted copyvio of [2].
  talk) 00:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bantor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See below. — ξ^xplicit 08:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ^xplicit 08:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Relisting note. Was tagged for deletion on August 15, but didn't seem to get listed. Presumably nominated as non-free toy art. — ξ^xplicit 08:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

File:Az-logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See below. — ξ^xplicit 08:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ^xplicit 08:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Relisting note. Was tagged for deletion on August 18, but didn't seem to get listed. Presumably nominated as a non-free logo. — ξ^xplicit 08:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy deleted This is almost certainly a copyvio and the article this was uploaded to be used in was deleted nearly three years ago, so free or not this image serves no purpose, the user who uploaded it has not made another edit since creating the now deleted article.
  talk) 19:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JeffConine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• JumboTron -> derivative image Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Photographing a copyrighted (presumably) broadcast on a jumbotron doesn't transfer rights to the photographer. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BlueBand PSUformation.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• JumboTron -> derivative image. If this were a picture of the JumboTron itself, de minimis might apply, but it's not: it's of the blue band. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Photographing a copyrighted (presumably) broadcast on a jumbotron doesn't transfer rights to the photographer. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vn-hcmmap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image; no use みんな空の下 (トーク) 10:38, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Map is possible copyright violation. みんな空の下 (トーク) 20:23, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picabia Hera.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unless we can show copyright was not renewed in the US, this is still a copyright here. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Where's here? Do we assume US is here? I don't know where Picabia was when he painted this. Maybe the U.S. Maybe France. Maybe Portugal. Maybe elsewhere. I suppose I could make a case for Fair Use, but then I have to take it outside the gallery code. Maybe I will. Long day in a long week. Your turn. --sparkit^TALK 02:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Wikimedia Foundation policy dictates that free content must be free in the US, regardless of place of authorship, because its servers are in the US. Here=US in my comment above. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn - copyright appears to not be renewed in US.

File:Pilsudski by Kossak portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Same reasoning as image directly above. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I guess we should switch it to fair use. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 15:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I don't think fair use would apply to the image in the article. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:34, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polishpeople.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The sources given on this are too vague to prove whether or not all of these images are out of copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pozole pinglo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourcing is too unspecific to clarify that this is PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Thanks for your comment, Mr. Bot ;)! However, the image is also tagged as PD, and we'd like to clarify which. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reamker dance theatre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unless copyright not renewed, this is not PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use. — ξ^xplicit 07:03, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Resurrection(Spencer).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unless we can prove the copyright was not renewed in the US, this is not PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Maybe someone who knows how to could investigate that. If it doesn't pass muster at PD, then it's still needed. It's an important work and the only one by Stanley Spencer in the article on him. I've added a fair use rationale.[3] If PD isn't established, that tag can be removed and the FU one left. If it is PD, then the FU rationale can be removed. Ty 01:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IPod Touch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Software screenshot.
   ℳono  15:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Photographing a screen doesn't transfer rights to the photographer. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pelevic.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is a photograph of a poster and does not have the ability to release this into the public domain. Whpq (talk) 16:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PelevicPoster.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is a photo of a poster and so the photographer is not the copyright holder and cannot release it into the public domain. Whpq (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graduation picture TJSL.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image added nothing of substance to the article it was attached to. These could be graduates anywhere, this tells us nothing about the school. Description is missing, and it is nearly identical to an image at [4], making the copyright status questionable. Uploader was adding a lot of spammy content to the article on the school and has an obvious
  talk) 19:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiitalk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Web screenshot - So can't be GFDL as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tempworkzone sing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Resembles UK pictogram, which are NOT freely licensed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Big Bang mnet 2008 award.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Web resolution, no metadata. Uploader has uploaded one previous copyvio of one of the members of
  Big Bang, so one can only assume this image of the group does not belong to the her either. — ξ^xplicit 23:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.