Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 26

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1955 Greater Los Angeles Area -1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a copy-paste of a map that has a copyright notice visible, copyright belogs to H.M. Gousha Inc. The claim of Creative commons is not correct. Dave (talk) 02:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Tentative keep - Gousha went out of business decades ago, so the copyright almost certainly wasn't renewed. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. However, even if that is correct, that still makes the image improperly tagged. It would be some variant of copyright expired, not creative commons. I tried to see if any news articles mentioned if the IP went along with the acquirers of Gousha's assets, so far the results have been inconclusive. Dave (talk) 23:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franz Kafka young.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is an old photo of Kafka. He died in 1924 so it is from there or before. Can anyone help fix the license or tell us that it is not ok? MGA73 (talk) 09:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hackalone Main Site 26 Feb 2012.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work.
  Stefan2 (talk) 09:35, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eric Pickles Official.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I can only find a thumb on source. There is a bigger version on flickr but it is under an unfree license. So how do we know it is ok? MGA73 (talk) 16:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is released under the OGL under the Controller of HMSO's offer. —innotata 18:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • We know that the thumbnail is released under that license, but how do we know that the higher resolution version is released under that license? Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:44, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete per commons:COM:DW Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prucenterscore.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image appears at
  Stefan2 (talk) 19:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kev pic yerablur church.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in Armenia per Commons:COP:FOP#Armenia. MGA73 (talk) 20:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - {{
  FoP-USonly}} Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kev pic yerablur church1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP in Armenia per Commons:COP:FOP#Armenia. MGA73 (talk) 20:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - {{
  FoP-USonly}} Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

File:Simón Bolívar statue.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Statue - as understand it created by Felix de Weldon (April 12, 1907–June 3, 2003). So it is not from 18xx as the text under the statue could suggest. Question is when and if this is copyrighted. No FOP in the US for statues. MGA73 (talk) 20:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Simón Bolívar statue.JPG. --MGA73 (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rbmetal.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Image is free to use for non-commercial/educational purposes only" Additionally, no source.
  Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: procedural keep - wrong venue; already relisted at FFD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unit code black41.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused (except sandbox filled with random pictures), without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 21:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2polcorps ostrowski.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "A photograph from my own collection." in a web resolution, may be copied from this site Bulwersator (talk) 21:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • If we could figure out where it was first published, it might qualify as public domain due to {{PD-Poland}}. But if it was never published until at least 1994 (e.g., if the uploader is the first publisher), then at very least it would qualify for publisher's rights in EU law (see de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Probleme mit nachgelassenen Werken); it would not be in the PD in the US either until 120 years after it was taken. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:57, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2polcorps ostrowski2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "A photograph from my own collection." in a web resolution, may be copied from this site Bulwersator (talk) 21:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ditto (above). Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

File:SSC Water Tank.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this water tank "habitable by humans" as required by
  Stefan2 (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - it is as habitable as a "gazebo" or "garden pavilion." Also, I think the design of the architecture itself is probably too simple to merit copyright`. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, keep then. I'm not sure exactly when a construction isn't habitable. A
    Stefan2 (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ISS009-E-7622- Zambezi river near Mongu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Without source, unable to recreate source Bulwersator (talk) 22:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Source found by
    WP:ASTRO Bulwersator (talk) 06:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Would you please add the source? It is currently {{
      bsr}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
      ]
      • It is sourced to this page on Commons but the colours are quite different, at least when looking at the thumbnail on that page. The high-resolution version gives a "file not found" error for me. --
        Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
        ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

File:Walkoff Parking2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See
  Stefan2 (talk) 22:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - I don't see any prose or poetry in that, just a very short set of instructions. Just like a photograph of a car doesn't warrant copyright, even though it technically might be complex enough, and yet the purpose of the elements within in such an order is for practical purposes. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.