Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 September 9

Cross-space redirects are BADDDDDD. Hbdragon88 04:57, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Generally, Delete, as this template is designed solely for one user, so it has no other use. However, a number of images use it (I'm not exactly sure for what purpose), and it needs to be replaced there first.
  Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 23:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Assuming personalised GFDL templates are not discouraged, I would suggest the way to go about this is to use the full location—a template in userspace with a templatespace redirect to it may as well be in template space anyways—and definately substitute it. As far as the redirect, delete it. If it's not for template space, don't have a redirect there. BigNate37_(T) 03:42, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is pointless. Should we add a redirect for every single semi-regular line every tv character says? Tony P 04:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Neutral. As the release of the movie nears, I created this redirect to discourage the possible creation of a Boratcruft article at this space, as it is one of the more familiar phrases in the Borat lexicon (along the lines of
  Florence Jean Casselberry). If others find this logic presumptuous or flawed (i.e., why this phrase and not the others?), then I have no objection to its deletion as well. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep for nonsense-prevention purposes as per the above. --Gavia immer 14:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Gives wrong impression that "sexy time" is some clown. Pavel Vozenilek 03:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Catchphrase commonly associated with character. -
  talk/email 05:46, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep until which time a disambiguation page is needed. I'm assuming this is the only notable use of this phrase to date, though I've never heard it before. BigNate37_(T) 15:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]