Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 March 11

The result of the debate was delete. —freak(talk) 07:52, Mar. 16, 2007 (UTC)

Cross-namespace redirect. Doesn't seem to serve any useful purpose as anyone requesting a Bot (or wishing to comment on requests) would know to look in the Wikipedia namespace. WjBscribe 02:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No incoming, cnr, not really useful. --- RockMFR 04:29, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, undesirable cross-namespace redirect –
  Qxz 19:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete the cross-namespace redirect. No need. Alex43223 ^{T | C | E} 23:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since unlikely-to-be-used, cross namespace redirect. -- Jreferee 15:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. —freak(talk) 07:52, Mar. 16, 2007 (UTC)

Another cross-namespace redirect with no relevance to encyclopedia users. WjBscribe 02:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Just one incoming link, cnr, not useful. --- RockMFR 04:29, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.
  bio) 18:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, undesirable cross-namespace redirect –
  Qxz 19:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete as I stated, cross namespace redirect. Alex43223 ^{T | C | E} 23:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since unlikely-to-be-used cross namespace redirect. -- Jreferee 15:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was deleted by NawlinWiki as a nonsense redirect. WjBscribe 23:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...and a bunch of others with similar names. I don't know if there is any real reason these redirects exist. Was someone just being annoying? Stevage 13:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First nomination

• Comment - see http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/AAAAAAAAA! --- RockMFR 17:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is actually an inside joke in Uncyclopedia. bibliomaniac15 00:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - erm, shouldn't inside jokes be kept, well, "inside"? Why do we want to honour their inside joke here? Stevage 03:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete One of these was just deleted. [1] Wouldn't these fall under
  WP:CSD#R3? — MichaelLinnear 03:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment. In addition,
  Kitten huffing is another redirect to Uncyclopedia. bibliomaniac15 04:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep because they serve to help discourage the recreation of popular Uncyclopedia pages here. (If you're an admin, see the deleted history of
  Kitten huffing.) --ais523 10:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC
  )

We should not let vandals control what is done here. — MichaelLinnear 23:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 August 8. Uncle G 21:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• On second thought, retargetting would be a much better solution, as there is no mention of AAAAAAAAAA! in the current article. bibliomaniac15 05:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to what? — MichaelLinnear 05:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and protect per Ais523 –
  Qxz 19:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Come on, this is getting silly. Keep and add a brief reference to AAAAA to the article. >Radiant< 10:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Retarget results of the
  Psyklopedin. -- Jreferee 14:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Pavel Vozenilek 01:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete John Reaves (talk) 09:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Left over from a useless page move from a while ago that I reverted without controversy. — flamingspinach | (talk) 15:10, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete After doing a search, the only things I seem to find are users profiles on various sites. No need to keep. Alex43223 ^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 22:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.
  bio) 18:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. Useless redirect term. --- RockMFR 23:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I expanded the
  Camkid should also be delted under similar reasoning.-- Jreferee 15:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.