Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 October 22

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete.

Tikiwont (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

• (̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅()ڪے → Cigarette (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Delete - pretty but not useful. ASCII art is to be discouraged. TB (talk) 23:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Cute, but still Delete As a very unlikely redirect.--Lenticel ^(talk) 03:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it may be interesting but I doubt that anyone looking for the cigarette article would think to type that a search term.--174.93.171.10 (talk) 04:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's good for all individual characters to be bluelinks, since they're easy to type if you have the right keyboards, but who's going to type this? Even if you see it somewhere, you're almost certainly going to type the wrong number of ̅ characters. Nyttend (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Procedural close. Ruslik_Zero 18:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• 12th Indian Telly Awards (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete
   ] 

11th Award ceremony can't redirect to 12th one. Whats the logic? Please delete. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The reference says it's actually the 11th. The 12th article appears to be partly copy-and-pasted from the 11th article. TimBentley (talk) 12:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• History merge at
  Tikiwont (talk) 21:00, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I added a ref and updated the article, but with tile still intact that was confusing, so I went ahead with the history merge.

Tikiwont (talk) 20:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

• Livermore Valley Charter School → Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

(Posting on behalf of 24.4.29.155 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), who posted a message on my talk)

The LVCS is in no way part of the LVJUSD (http://www.livermoreschools.com/) and that is wrong information. The LVCS is a charter school run by the TVLC charter district (http://www.trivalleylearning.org/) while the LVJUSD is the public school district in the city. They are actually at odds most of them time.^[1] —GFOLEY FOUR!— 03:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Livermore, California#Other schools where this school is mentioned until someone creates an article. Ego White Tray (talk) 00:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete. G6 Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup (deleted by

User:Amatulic) Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 21:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

• Jacob (Lost)/redirects → Jacob (Lost) (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Bizarre redirect that seems like nonsense. Potentially confusing and not necessary. --

• This looks like the leftovers of some sort of complicated move, in which case it might be eligible for G6. However, I'm not 100% certain so I'll leave a message for user:Anthony Appleyard who did the moving. Thryduulf (talk) 09:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I was asked to move
  WP:Parallel history. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Looking at the history of the "Jacob (Lost)/redirects" page, it doesn't seem like there is anything valuable there- it's merely a history of modified redirects. I would propose deleting it, since the history at "Jacob (Lost)" suitably shows the development of the article. --
    Wikipedical (talk) 21:29, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete. Thanks for the explanation Anthony. A note at Talk:Jacob (Lost) pointing to where the redirect's history can be retrieved from if ever desired should be sufficient I think. Thryduulf (talk) 11:14, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Done "A note at Talk:Jacob (Lost) pointing to...". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• G6 Speedy Delete per Anthony Appleyard. No significant history, not worth copying it to a talk page. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 14:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.