Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 October 29

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

October 29

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 29, 2013.

Machine-gun nest

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Defensive fighting position. NAC. The Whispering Wind (talk) 23:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target article and thus of limited to no value. There was also no mention at the target article when the redirect was created. I can't conceive of a reader using this without knowing what a machine gun is. BDD (talk) 23:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Defensive fighting position. While it's not directly mentioned in the article, the article says that more complex and durable structures can house a machine gun crew. --Lenticel (talk) 07:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me. --BDD (talk) 17:41, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Henry Maidment

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence the target has ever been known as "Henry Maidment" Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 00:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - article was at this title for over 4 years so deletion likely to break external links eg this one. This name used from time to time, eg [1][2]. We have no page on an another Henry Maidment so not confusing. The Whispering Wind (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • It does not make any sense, though, so deletion is the best option. The fact that it was at this title for a while does not justify inclusion. It is confusing, as readers will have no idea why they wound up at this page. There is also an artist that has this name, so people may be looking for him and end up here for no reason. It's not harmless. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmm, I take the point about the painter. I guess the best solution, if he is notable, which he may be, is creating an article on him with a hattnote. However, taking things as they are for now, since the incorrect name 'Henry_Maidment' is used on occaision then it becomes a plausible search term. Also, avoiding deletion that breaks external links is also a sound keep reason -
    WP:RFD#KEEP point 4. The Whispering Wind (talk) 23:08, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 23:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It's an unlikely (perhaps) although plausible search term that may have many links from the vast Internet. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 18:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Disney Family Movies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Disney Channel#Other services. --BDD (talk) 00:18, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unuseful redirect for a VOD service, and Disney Family Movies Asia is unsourced. jcn

RA 09:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 23:29, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to
    chatter) 09:04, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Romanian Revolution

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by RHaworth. --BDD (talk) 05:14, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This

WP:CNR created from a move error has resulted in a rater implausible search term. --BDD (talk) 23:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Mfd#Before nominating a page for deletion states "Pages in the wrong namespace (e.g. an article in Wikipedia namespace), can simply be moved and then tag the redirect for speedy deletion using {{db-g6|rationale= it's a redirect left after a cross-namespace move}}. Notify the author of the original article of the cross-namespace move.)". This is applicable to RFD as well. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 02:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Multiple redirects to
Liberal eugenics

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 7#Multiple redirects to Liberal eugenics

MUltiple Redirects to Grodno Region

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 7#Multiple redirects to Grodno Region

No indication that this station provides any local content

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted as the title has no direct relation to the network whose page it redirects to, and could be interpreted as a POV slam against the network. Tdl1060 (talk) 03:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - this seems to be an inadvertently created article that was meant to be a talk page comment. The Whispering Wind (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I was looking through the history of this redirect ... and ... well, it basically looks like one "oops" was turned into another "oops". Anyways, I agree to delete per all of the above. Steel1943 (talk) 04:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 04:41, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Talk page comment created as talk page heading accidently; no harm, no foul to delete this.
    chatter) 09:13, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2013_October_29&oldid=1138579280"