Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 September 5

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

September 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 5, 2015.

Atlanta (version 2)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as
WP:CSD#G6, by User:Mackensen. —Keφr 05:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Implausible redirect, should be deleted JMHamo (talk) 23:45, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This was a leftover redirect after moving an article to save history edits. -Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 23:52, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above.
    computer 00:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

But

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. I'll add a link to Conjunction (grammar) to the dab, however, since we do have encyclopedic discussion of the English word. --BDD (talk) 13:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since this grammatical conjunction is the only one that redirects to Conjunction (grammar), I do not see this target being helpful. In conclusion, retarget to BUT; there is currently a link there referring the reader to wikt:but. Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Um, it is not a conjuction but a disjunction. Si Trew (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The conjunction article covers "but". -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 04:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Whee

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 September 16#Whee

Crimenetly

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 September 16#Crimenetly

Gah!

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is an example of an interjection, but the only interjection is not "gah". Probably best to delete this redirect; retargeting to the disambiguation page is questionable since no entries on the page utilize an exclamation point. Steel1943 (talk) 20:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom: also not at Wiktionary.
    computer 21:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Retarget to Gah -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - A re-target change wouldn't be a bad idea, but the exclamation point means that it's really not likely that someone is looking for the other uses of the term. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

슈주피디아

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sujupedia is not mentioned at the target. Gorobay (talk) 01:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Ideal School of Manhattan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of subject on the target page. The subject appears to be a school, which is expanding into a high school and thus could have its own article. Better as a red link. Ravendrop 00:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - If this is asserting the opinion that the school is the
    WP:NPOV issues, and it should be deleted; if the school teaches Idealism, and it can be sourced as being called that, it may be reasonable to keep it.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 03:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Surely, at least
Ideal School & College
also redirects.
But we don't have
WP:PROMO. Si Trew (talk) 05:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment We have neither Ideal School of Manhattan nor Manhattan Ideal School, I struck me duplicate !vote, sorry about that. Si Trew (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - It's just not a helpful redirect. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per
    computer 17:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_September_5&oldid=1037881128"