Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 23

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 21:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• List of features new to Windows XP → Features new to Windows XP  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• List of features new to Windows Vista → Features new to Windows Vista  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• List of features new to Windows 7 → Features new to Windows 7  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• List of features new to Windows 8 → Features new to Windows 8  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• List of features new to Windows 10 → Features new to Windows 10  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The targets of these redirects are not list articles, as stated by

• Keep all - it's hard to imagine that someone looking for a list of features new to Windows 7 would be disappointed by being pointed at an article discussing the features which were added when Windows 7 was released, and it's extremely unlikely that we would have a list alongside this article. Frankly I think the issue of whether or not this page qualifies as a list or not is a bit of rampant pedantry, all in good faith of course but still unnecessary. Also note that the features removed are in lists: List of features removed in Windows 7 and so on. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all per Ivanvector. Steel1943 (talk) 04:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all harmless, useful search terms, @
  valid reason for deletion. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 06:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete all. The search engine can handle this. Icanvector is right for the most but deleting them is just good sense. They are harmless though. But again, I haven't seen a harmful redirect yet. Fleet Command (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all. Plausible search terms, in line with other "list of ..." redirects.
  flyer 13:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Jasmine van den Bogaerde, best known as Birdy → Birdy (singer)  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Jasmine Van den Bogaerde, commonly known as Birdy → Birdy (singer)  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't think any reader would type this into the search box.

• Delete - unlikely search term. If someone knows the person's name, there's no need for them to continue typing the "best known as" part. Stats are near zero. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Bush family. Thanks for the suggestion! (non-admin closure) -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Walker Bush → George W. Bush  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, no one is known simply as "Walker Bush." It also has the

• There's a Walker Bush mentioned a couple times at Bush family, but he doesn't have an article. - Eureka Lott 04:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to
  sst✈ 08:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Retarget to
  WP:XY problem. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Bush family is a good target. It also discusses the Bush connection to the Walker family, the reason they have "Walker" in their names. Consider it withdrawn. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.