Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 27

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

November 27

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 27, 2017.

Brutal Ledgend

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted per G7. (]

Implausible misspelling. Less than 5 views a day on average, almost certainly stemming from the fact that typing "Brutal Legend" (Or just "brutal l") in the search bar suggests this redirect. See

Brutal Legend from auto-search. -- ferret (talk) 18:20, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Szechuan sauce

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 5#Szechuan sauce

Gamaecube

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Despite what was said at the first RFD for this title, this is not a plausible mistake. It's not a likely misspelling (unlike "advertizing", for example), or the likely result of hitting adjacent keys or hitting keys out of order — QWERTY, AZERTY, and QWERTZ all have "a" and "e" far enough apart that you can't type a random extra "a" with fat fingers, and you might as well create gamxecube or gamgecube, because those are just as close as gamaecube is. Nyttend (talk) 12:50, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

S. C. Rai

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I withdraw my nomination. Also, it seems to be a case of ]

Unnecessary redirect for newly created page. Checked, and fixed all the links. —usernamekiran(talk) 11:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dr. S. C. Rai

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I withdraw my nomination. Also, it seems to be a case of ]

Unnecessary redirect for newly created page. Checked, and fixed all the links. —usernamekiran(talk) 11:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Harrie Jekkers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 5#Harrie Jekkers

Rexit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Reign. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to

WP:RECENTISM. I would just go fix it, but figured it was worth discussion, given the amount of drama surrounding all things Trump-connected.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  00:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.