Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 31

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Magical Canan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete
   ] 

This is a reasonably prolific anime director, with no justification for redirecting to just one of his works. In the absence of an article the reader is better served by a redlink. Xezbeth (talk) 17:16, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom but don't create an article where it is just a list of works. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:51, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and maybe
  WP:REDLINK. Whether he's notable or non-notable, for a person who's worked on many things, search results are always better than a redirect to a single work. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 13:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• C. Montgomery Burns Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence → Brother, Can You Spare Two Dimes?  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Way too implausible. This search term is dubious enough as it is, but how many people are going to miss out the words "Award for", and ADD "C." at the start? Thegreatluigi (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.
  Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence already exists. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:58, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Rich creamery butter → Bart's Friend Falls in Love  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a particularly notable joke. Doesn't seem notable enough for a redirect, at any rate. Thegreatluigi (talk) 13:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Phrase is not used in article. Looks like an obscure, trivial reference. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 14:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this isn't The Simpsons Wikia. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:34, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete seems to be a part of an obscure joke --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom gupdoo3  3oodpug 01:05, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Burns to Sell → Burns Verkaufen der Kraftwerk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems rather implausible. Has only had 26 views in over 3 years. Thegreatluigi (talk) 13:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Phrase is not used in article. Looks like an obscure, trivial reference. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 14:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:34, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as obscure synonym/trivia at best --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• We demand more asbestos! → Lisa's Substitute  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a particularly notable joke. If any sort of memorable line needs a redirect, you'd need at least a dozen redirects per episode. Thegreatluigi (talk) 13:27, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Phrase is not used in article. Looks like an obscure, trivial reference. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not The Simpsons Wikia. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:34, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as obscure joke --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:31, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. gupdoo3  3oodpug 01:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Godsword → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Overly generic, not mentioned in article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 05:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per
  WP:GAMECRUFT. Waterco4 (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete or Weak dabify with the following entries: Godsword, the name of a sword from the Arai Family in the manga series Rurouni Kenshin; God's Word; God's Word Translation (www.godsword.org); The Sword of God At least those have entries compared to the Runescape one. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Disam if anyone can find examples of its use, If not Delete per GAMECRUFT. –Davey2010^Talk 21:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as gaming trivia (Wikipedia isn't Runescape Wikia). Closest synonym that I got was God's word which is really pushing it in my opinion --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Runescape Power Leveling → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Blatant

• Keep, old and harmless. GAMEGUIDE is a content guide, not a redirect guide. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  
• Delete per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 04:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. The redirect promises content which Wikipedia cannot deliver: the target has no content about power leveling, and
  WP:GAMEGUIDE explains why not. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • More rationale
    power levelling refers specifically to tactics for getting experience points quickly (see e.g. wikia:RuneScape:Power levelling), not just the general concept of raising levels, so I disagree that this is discussed at the target. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:21, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]

• Delete per nom - GAMECRUFT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davey2010 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as confusing since the main article doesn't discuss power levelling. Also seems to be gamecrufty. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As Bad Hat Harry has been created, this can be deleted. In general, I feel it's likely better to just move without a redirect to preserve history, but sobeit. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Bad Hat Harry Productions  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete
   ] 

Delete – no incoming links, simple miscapitalization. No similar redirect at the correct, more likely form Bad Hat Harry (note: the latter page was created on 3 April 2018). —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC) (edited 14:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

• Keep considering their logo is "Bad Hat Harry", and caps like that is plausible. Optionally, move to Bad Hat Harry AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:18, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • A move would create a
    double redirect at Bad hat harry, which would then have to be re-targeted to the current page anyway. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to

(non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• Fighting for Freedom → Richard Landwehr  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A non-notable title from a fringe author. No incoming links. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Regardless of capitalization, the term should not be associated with this author alone – that would imply POV about the subject. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to
    Fighting for Freedom (film) as preparation to simply move film article to this title. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]

*Delete as per above - Should not be associated with any BLP. –Davey2010^Talk 21:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• • Redirect as per CWM & Lenticel. –Davey2010^Talk 01:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• I think that we should retarget this to '
  Fighting for Freedom (film)'. I'm averse to creating a disambiguation page or something like that when the term is highly associated with said movie, while the revisionist WWII book is pretty obscure. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• retarget to
  Fighting for Freedom (film) per CWM --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support move over redirect for the film. Add hatnote to book. I may create a similar Fight for Freedom (disambiguation) page as there are multiple ones with that have that as a title or subtitle, and that could attract the alternatives. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. R3-able ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Gough and Inaccessible Islands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete
   ] 

The redirect would imply, to me, that its creator believes that Gough and Inaccessible Islands are the only World Heritage Sites in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha. Firstly, I'm not certain if that is the case. Secondly, there is an active application to add the Islands of Saint Helena as a world heritage site (http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5675/), which would give this territory two such sites.