Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/MykReeve

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

MykReeve

Dr Reeve has been around for a few months, and has contributed good articles and some very nice images. I have not checked the number of edits, but the quality may be seen in the exemplar

Royal Oak (tree). -- Kaihsu
23:06, 2004 May 1 (UTC)

I'm pleased and flattered to accept the nomination. Thanks! - MykReeve 18:54, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Support:

  1. Kaihsu 23:06, 2004 May 1 (UTC)
  2. fabiform | talk 23:20, 1 May 2004 (UTC) Myk's a good calm editor who'd make a great admin.[reply]
  3. theresa knott 00:19, 2 May 2004 (UTC) I thought he was one already[reply]
  4. Nice writings. --Menchi 00:22, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  5. 550 edits is plenty for me, esp. when they're of quality. Meelar 00:52, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Maximus Rex 01:30, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  7. A review shows generally calm and composed behavior while working on the alternative medicine articles. Isomorphic 02:20, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Contributor since December 14, 2003. I'm not concerned with frequency or number of edits: He's been around awhile, and he produces quality work. I support 100%. Cribcage 03:02, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Much excellence.
    Seth Ilys 05:56, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  10. Angela
  11. Calm and thoughful. BCorr|Брайен 11:27, May 2, 2004 (UTC)
  12. Danny 16:00, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Wikipedia is not an exclusive country club: adminship should be granted based on qualitative performance, not quantitative, IMHO. --"DICK" CHENEY 19:05, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Guanaco 19:32, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Stewart Adcock 00:29, 3 May 2004 (UTC) More than enough edits for me to conclude that he'd make a trustworthy admin.[reply]
  16. I don't know what 200-300 more edits would tell me that the excellent 500+ haven't already -- there's been plenty of time for Myk to get into trouble if that was coming. Does very solid work, in my experience. Jwrosenzweig 16:10, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  17. His work so far is good enough evidence of qualifications. Let's not set our edit count expectations so high that people have to make Wikipedia a full-time job for six months to become admin. --Michael Snow 16:48, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support. Supersolid, involved contributions. Good choice. jengod 20:07, May 3, 2004 (UTC)
  19. 172 22:58, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support. User has ~= 650 edits. He takes pictures, too! :) - Fennec 13:26, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
  21. Support. →Raul654 23:06, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
  22. Gaz 14:35, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

  1. Far too few edits, IMHO. Kingturtle 00:50, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Maybe in a couple more months. RickK 00:53, 2 May 2004
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/MykReeve&oldid=1142574351"