Wikipedia:Requests for comment/TyrusThomas4lyf
In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 10:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 00:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC).
- TyrusThomas4lyf (talk · contribs · logs)
Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.
Statement of the dispute
User
Desired outcome
Hopefully Tyrus will show a little more unbiased, NPOV behavior, not try to bully other editors, and be more civil. If not perhaps he should move on from editing articles relating to Jordan, Bryant, James, and Wade.
Description
The user TyrusThomas4lyfe has exhibited incredible biased behavior. He refuses to acknowledge consensus on articles such as
Evidence of disputed behavior
Uncivil Behavior, keep in mind he is also the IP as shown above. Note: As of right now I don't have time to work up all the Jordan, Bryant, James, and Wade diffs to show the pro-Jordan bias and anti-James, Bryant, and Wade biases. Later I will work to do this, any help would be appreciated.
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12] —The preceding ]
- [13] Myasuda 13:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- [14] Myasuda 13:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- [15] Myasuda 13:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- [16] On these next two Tryus deletes other's comments on this RFC. Aaron Bowen 04:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- [17]
- [18] Aaron Bowen 05:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- [19]Immortal_Dragon 14:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)]
- [20] Aaron Bowen 23:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- [21] ZodiiakDial Z 17:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Editing biases
- [22] : An illustrative edit simultaneously showing an attempt to diminish Kobe Bryant's performance, insertion of Michael Jordan related cruft, and the surreptitious replacement of relevant information (but not supportive of Michael Jordan's legacy) with information that's intended to elevate Jordan's accomplishment. Myasuda 01:56, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- [23]: Premature/unilateral removal of cite tags attached to unsourced data associated with Michael Jordan. Myasuda 02:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Applicable policies and guidelines
- WP:NPOV
- Edit warring reverting consensus
- WP:CIVIL
- WP:3RR
- WP:FAITH
- talk • contribs) 21:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC).]
Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
- See user's original talk page where I went out of my way to welcome him and try be civil to him.
- See archives
- See current talk page
Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}
- Tayquan hollaMy work 18:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC) I tried to discuss things with him over on the Lebron James talk page and as stated above he ignored everybody and went ahead with his edits.
- Aaron Bowen 21:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC) I tried to work with him on the Jordan article to no avail. He seems to be a bully who doesn't want to discuss things. Also a look over his edit history reveals the bias people pointed out above. Almost every edit he makes related to a Jordan related article makes Jordan look better, while every edit to the other players articles downplays their accomplishments.
- Chris 21:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC) I try to warn him here to stop calling me names when I edited the 2007 playoffs page, but he ignore me. So I bring it up to the ANI (click here to see)
- Duhon 03:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC) I as well tried to reason with him and advised him not to make sweeping edits without consesus click here to see needless to say my efforts were in vain.
Other users who endorse this summary
Response
This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary:
Outside view
This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary:
Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.