Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 151

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

• Raksha Changappa · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Kindly let me edit the article to meet Wiki standards. -Polymath0 (talk) 12:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was

fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori!

18:22, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

• If you wish this could be restored to a userspace draft, or other draft, as this could be edited to be encyclopedic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:21, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cassette-Translifter System · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Liftec ASA, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk
  ) 13:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wes Malik · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 101.50.93.104, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. page is at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wes Malik. Graeme Bartlett (talk
  ) 13:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wasif Husaini (Politician) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Not given reference for this article,, but now I got it at: http://fciweb.nic.in/upload/Rti/State_Consultative_Committee_LIST_25112011_eng.pdf -Masoomf (talk) 13:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Got anything else? That reference is just a list, not coverage of the subject. See

talk

) 18:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

• Muhammed Ragib Nizam · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The Title is correct and true evidence of a Person Who is an author Form Bangladesh and this page should not be deleted because the external links of blogs Carries his/her name. then click the "Save page" button below -Jisan.ctg (talk) 13:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was

fair-use policies. The number of blogs that have written about him doesn't matter, as we don't accept blogs as sources unless the blogger is an renowned expert speaking on a matter relevant to his field. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori!

17:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

• do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. It is the absence of non-blog sources that is the problem. Graeme Bartlett (talk
  ) 22:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robyn Goss · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Tntjim, request the undeletion of this

• Bethel Assembly Of God Church Thuvayoor · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It was a clash with tiltes lead to the speedy deletion but now the problem is solved and that page can continue it's sucessful working and then click the "Save page" button below -Wellwisherobliged (talk) 03:43, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• AG Church Thuvayoor · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

It was a problem with the titles.So no need for further deltion of this page.As tagged by the user.And that tag was {{db-7}} something like that -Abinpbiju (talk) 03:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• (｡◕‿◕｡)
  04:10, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• I'm merging these two requests, since they're for the same article. Also, the current reason for deletion appears to be over notability rather than what the church is or isn't named. The original nominator looks like they want to withdraw, but the issue is that if other editors believe that there is a valid reason for deletion (usually notability issues) then the AfD will remain open.
  (｡◕‿◕｡)
  04:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• Deo's Closet · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your {{AFC submission|||ts=20140902055957|u=Jhedai19|ns=4}} here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jhedai19 (talk) 05:59, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• (｡◕‿◕｡)
  07:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Luke Hunt · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Zonefocus, request the undeletion of this

I'll get back to finding examples; Luke Hunt's byline appears in several outlets, some including a photo byline that matches his Twitter avatar. It's apparent that he exists and reports and writes analyses for major news outlets, which presumably are trustworthy enough to bolster his case as a Wikipedia journalist entry -Zonefocus (talk) 04:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• (｡◕‿◕｡)
  07:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• I do have to warn you that being a journalist does not automatically show notability for someone. While we would like to have proof that he wrote for various places, they will only be considered
  (｡◕‿◕｡)
  07:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• Sunil Dutta · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The article has been deleted based on a political controversy going on. As such, it is a deletion based on politics and prejudice. -Heather1964 (talk) 06:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• (｡◕‿◕｡)
  07:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• @
  (｡◕‿◕｡)
  07:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
• If you do go to deletion review, I'd argue for notability based upon coverage in reliable sources and provide as much coverage as you can- preferably new ones that were not previously on the article.
  (｡◕‿◕｡)
  07:43, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• Scott Victor Gutierrez · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

More Time To Edit To make It verifiable -Scott_Victor_Gutierrez 10:38, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. the panda ₯’
  11:05, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kim Perry · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Kp4kids, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk
  ) 11:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• Draft:BP Analytics · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Maurice2008, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk
  ) 18:41, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• User:Jerrett9000/Lobstick · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Jerrett9000, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk
  ) 18:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• Sun Liangang · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It's an introduction of a celebrity in China. We will add references. -Yolanda416 (talk) 18:57, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

 Declined. Yolanda416, that article was so blatantly promotional that there is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring it. Please use Facebook for such material. And who is "we"?

You can try submitting it to

talk

) 19:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U-part wigs · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 78.149.243.100, request the undeletion of this

I'd like to make the necessary edits to comply with your rules and have the article published pleased. -78.149.243.100 (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• (｡◕‿◕｡)
  07:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• On a side note, please avoid using phrases that start like this: "Belo's idea was so fantastic in delivering realistic hairlines that it was an instant success amongst the hair industry". The thing is, no matter how frequently you tell us how fantastic or revolutionary something is, it's still seen as promotional and we would still require coverage in independent and reliable sources per
  (｡◕‿◕｡)
  07:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ Automated Function Point · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Depot75, request the undeletion of this

• The Sharon Disney Lund School of Dance · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

It's not under that title. Is the capitalisation accurate (Wikipedia articles are case-sensitive)? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 05:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

• I can't find anything in your edit history about a School of Dance. Did you make it under a different account name?
  (｡◕‿◕｡)
  08:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Other pages that may be of interest to Cyberpuke include

Sharon Disney Lund School of Dance, but this is just a redirect. Is any of this what you want back? Graeme Bartlett (talk

) 08:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

That "article" was created as a redirect 1.5yrs ago. It was never a separate article, but always pointed to the more notable topic: the university overall the panda ₯’ 08:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• @
  (｡◕‿◕｡)
  10:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
• (｡◕‿◕｡)
  10:39, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vladimir Pakhomov · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Kirill24, request the undeletion of this

• Aditya Kudaravalli · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I want this to represent myself.. There are many Celebrity profile. They are not useful. But why are you accepting them and deleting my page? -Blackdhoom (talk) 14:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. There was no indication whatsoever that the article was about a notable person. See

talk

) 16:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• User:Rredinger2014/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Rredinger2014, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk
  ) 19:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dmytro Morykit · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk
  ) 21:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Death(novel) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Timee5, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk
  ) 23:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• Michael Felgate · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Needed information -Paralimni (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

• deletion review, though I don't think that will be successful unless there are significant new sources available. Protonk (talk
  ) 14:13, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

• Ahmed_Gheselbash · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ahmed Gheselbash (talk) 14:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC) please can you send the page back

• articles for creation for some pointers but I'd implore you not to waste time writing an article about yourself as those tend not to be retained. Protonk (talk
  ) 14:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Braden Diotte · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Skinwalker66, request the undeletion of this

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk

) 23:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vizion Interactive · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Joshuatitsworth, request the undeletion of this

@

User:Tokyogirl79, after your request back on August 14.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk

) 23:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC)