Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ali banu sistani/Archive

Ali banu sistani (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

03 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

• Eyafocul (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• MbIam9416 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I believe Ali banu sistani is same as Eyafocul and Mblam9416. Because all three accounts keep inserting exact same and similar unexplained changes after they were reverted. On article Third Battle of Panipat, revision history, following change was made by: 01:43, 29 April 2021‎ MbIam9416 

Then account Ali banu sistani, made same exact change: 10:28, 3 June 2021‎ Ali banu sistani

Also user account Eyafocul is making similar unexplained insertion into the article:

Shah Vali Khan

All these three accounts especially Mblam9416 and Ali bani sistani are sock puppets. Mblam9416 has already been warned previously under Sockpuppet Investigation as he was using IP sock puppet before. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MbIam9416 [1]

On the other hand Ali banu sistani account has been given number of warnings on the profiles talk page for misbehaving, vandalism, deletion of referenced sources, and removing articles of deletion notices. The individual has also been uncivil and went as far as adding fake {{Sockpuppeteer|blocked}} notice on my profile page, trying to cause annoyance. My profiles revision history will show it as proof. HaughtonBrit (talk) 17:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• @HaughtonBrit: SPI is severely backlogged and I don't have the time to look through entire contribution histories myself. Could you please provide diffs, ideally in bulleted list format, showing the accounts exhibiting the same behaviours as opposed to quoting edits they make? Thanks. --Blablubbs|talk 13:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Requested diffs not supplied, closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

26 August 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

• RamanBalach (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Edit warring at the

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Already blocked, closing. MarioGom (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]