Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ParillasAndrie/Archive

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


ParillasAndrie

ParillasAndrie (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

07 October 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

The first two were blocked per

WP:DUCK isn't as clear here. It would be good to check for sleepers as well. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:09, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments




09 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Created shortly after latest sock, WikiBoyLove, was blocked. Lots of commonality with WikiBoyLove and the puppeteer, ParillasAndrie. Onel5969 TT me 13:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Hanara143 is  Possible. Same country, different user agent and ISP. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Socks are bagged and tagged. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

ParillasAndrie is known for creating sockpuppets (such as bypassing his ban) that he decided to ignore all wiki rules and not listening to the wiki moderators. He recently created a new account called TheTrueColors and his edits look very similar to his other sockpuppet accounts. AsphereOfficial (talk) 00:39, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • diffs
    to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Created 5 days later after TheTrueColors was blocked. It provides a lot of commonality to their user page. AsphereOfficial (talk) 03:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


21 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

It provides a lot of commonality to their previous sockpuppets' user page. (Take a look at their revision history of his user page). AsphereOfficial (talk) 23:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


31 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Per request on my talk page. Similar style of userpage and overlapping interest in Philippine TV, including at least one article created by past socks. I'm not quite certain enough to block, but I believe there's enough to justify CU. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


30 January 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Most of their edits have been on two pages which two other socks of the puppeteer have also been heavily involved, see this and this. Account created shortly after the last sock was blocked, and one of the first edits they performed is moving a page, which is pretty unusual for a new editor, and suggests familiarity with WP procedures. Onel5969 TT me 15:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


29 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

As suggested by CruzRamiss2002, the editing habits of ParillasAndrie is very similar to that of AnsrieJames9's. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 08:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: According to AnsrieJames9's userpage, "Andrie James Parillas" is his name. He even admitted that ParillasAndrie is indeed his account (see [1]). Ansrie in "AnsrieJames9" is probably a typo. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 09:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Cabayi: I want to apologize that this user is chose to not sockpuppet. AnsrieJames9 (talk) 09:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - HueMan1, evidence is required. Cabayi (talk) 09:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk endorsed - The prior use of socks, and the Feb-July gap in the socks hints at there being other socks to be uncovered. Please confirm & check for sleepers. Cabayi (talk) 10:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  In progress - ~TNT (she/they • talk) 02:54, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • AnsrieJames9 is  Confirmed to previous sock, WikiBoyOfficial.  Blocked and tagged. Very busy range ~TNT (she/they • talk) 02:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

29 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

This account began editing on 1 July, just about when the socks of the master began editing, and began to be blocked. A main interest of AJ is

UPE than of sockpuppetry, but the two bad practices often overlap.) Robert McClenon (talk) 00:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Moving this day to ParillasAndrie; this sock was reported under Nic.cartagena12 on the same day. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08 October 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Under DraggyWiki's user page, the sentence (Here are the articles that created.) has been seen on four previous user pages made by the sockmaster itself: AnsrieJames9, LovesMe 2021, PapaArnold and TheGlimmerDays (with the latter three have the "I've" word between "that" and "created"). CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 11:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional update: The investigated user above just replaced its user page content with "Retired" currently (see revision before its replacement for the presented evidence above), and even probably admitting in Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines/Roster by saying "I'm leaving right now before block" in the edit summary after this SPI case is open (see revision for evidence). CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 14:36, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments