Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2010-09-14

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
2010-09-14 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. Already listed on the 13th. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:55, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 05:33, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 05:33, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. --Acather96 (talk) 05:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut/paste move. Messy since there was a later one onto the source. Have asked for a histmerge x2. VernoWhitney (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. Acather96 (talk) 05:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut/paste move. Histmerge requested. VernoWhitney (talk) 11:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Found a mirror site infringing on a mass scale, listed Acather96 (talk) 06:05, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 06:11, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. weird Acather96 (talk) 06:11, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Acather96 (talk) 06:16, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Now properly licensed at external site --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:CP. Acather96 (talk) 06:16, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Profile closed, wayback or cache wont work. Tagged for G11 though --Acather96 (talk) 06:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Now licensed at source. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 06:31, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 06:33, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 11:06, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chodavaram (West). CSBot reporting at 19:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Acather96 (talk) 11:06, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:45, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:47, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:05, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]