Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/khampalak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user,

read this

for detailed instructions.

User:khampalak

Suspected sockpuppeteer

khampalak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

ZRX222 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Afghansuperior (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Anoshirawan 03:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Evidence

This user Khampalak was banned a few months ago for vandalizing articles and and cursing admins and other users. Now he is coming on wikipedia with numerous sockpuppets and is vandalizing articles [1] [2]. His other Sockpuppets which were banned were [3] [4] [5] [6].

Comments

Provide diffs that show the connection. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Khampalak and Afghansuperior's edits on Ahmad Shah Durrani's article is similar plus the IPs match. Anoshirawan 07:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anoshirawan (talk • contribs)

Can someone please see recent edits of

Afghan American article over and over. [7] Why are his destructive actions ignored and you wanting to block constructive editors just because they revert his vandalism? It was already concluded not to change the word "Afghan" to "Afghanistani" in July 2007 (see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 July 27#Afghan people) but Anoshirawan keeps on changing the name to fake "Afghanistani" as well as removing clean images from the article. [8] Why are there images allowed at Italian Americans, Greek Americans, Iranian Americans, African Americans, and many others but he wants to only remove the imiages from Afghan American article. It's probably that administrators are afraid to block anoshirawan or probably they are supporting him to vandalis pages. Anoshirawan already has a long block log [9], shows that his character is not of a good editor, he should behave, he was also warned of his actions many times but he removed many of those warning from his talk page.--Afghansuperior (talk) 01:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Next, on

List of leaders of Afghanistan) This is very well known fact in Afghanistan as well as in all parts of the world. Anoshirawan claims that he was not all of that but a ruler of Khorasan, which is a province in Iran. This is like someone trying to say that George Washington was not the first President or founder of the United States but that he was a ruler of Washington or something like that. Anoshirawan is self POV pusher, not a nuetral editor like most of us. The things he claims don't make any sense to anyone that's why everyone is reverting his vandalism so that makes him upset. He also has a bad habit of removing images from the Ahmad Shah Durrani article, If you can also fully protect the Ahmad Shah Durrani article, that will help Anoshirawan go find another hobby instead of coming here vandalising pages.--Afghansuperior (talk) 02:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I have provided enough sources for my edits and This is no page to discuss these issues but you are a sockpuppet and the reason you got banned from wikipedia was because of your vandalism. --Anoshirawan 07:30, 22 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anoshirawan (talk • contribs)

Conclusions

All three blocked, NisarKand socks. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]