Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 November 19

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< November 18 November 20 >

November 19

Template:Mayors of Tacloban City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mayors of Tacloban City (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Whats the use of a template if its all empty links? This thing will find better use in a section in the main article. --RioHondo (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as pointless. The Tacloban article already has the exact same list of mayors, and that's where it belongs. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 04:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Navigates nothing; serves no current purpose. Xeltran (talk) 11:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:San Jose del Monte City Barangays

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:01, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:San Jose del Monte City Barangays (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox does not seem warranted. Navigates between two pages only. --RioHondo (talk) 14:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not needed for 2 entries. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 04:36, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does not navigate anything at all (2 articles don't count as substantial navigation). Unnecessary. Xeltran (talk) 11:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Eastern Visayas Provinces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Eastern Visayas Provinces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{

Region VIII Eastern Visayas}}. --RioHondo (talk) 14:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cordillera Administrative Region Provinces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cordillera Administrative Region Provinces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to {{Cordillera Administrative Region}}. --RioHondo (talk) 14:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as redundant. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 04:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Deprecated by the newer template. Redundant and likely unused. Xeltran (talk) 11:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Region XII SOCCSKSARGEN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Region XII SOCCSKSARGEN (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{

SOCCSKSARGEN}}. --RioHondo (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Calamba City Barangays

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Calamba City Barangays (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough articles to warrant a template. Links to only three. --RioHondo (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not needed for 3 links. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 04:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Substantially navigates nothing. Xeltran (talk) 11:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EDSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EDSA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete for the same reasons as

Not everything needs a navbox. --RioHondo (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Major Malls in Laguna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Major Malls in Laguna (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template that supposedly aims to navigate "malls and supermarkets" but only links a handful of articles. The rest of template is basically just a list. Much of the rational behind this nomination can be found at

WP:NENAN (even though it's technically just an essay and not a guideline). It all boils down to if this template is actually necessary and useful in the first place. Xeltran (talk) 01:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Phantogram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Phantogram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too few blue links (the duo's main page, one album, one EP) to warrant a navbox at this time (

WP:NENAN).  Gongshow Talk 09:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. With articles for only one album and one EP, navigation is simple enough amongst these 3 articles without the need of a navbox. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 08:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_November_19&oldid=1138535719"