Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 31

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spitfire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails

• Delete not about
  Spitfire -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. Only 3 relevant links. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation -- Whpq (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:50, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LogoCon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not needed as a template, should be simply substituted and deleted (or move to a subpage of the corresponding project). Frietjes (talk) 18:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Subst and delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:20, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 8. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 8. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:46, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hail the Villain (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails

• Delete: I went in and was going to make an attempt to save some of these, but I just can't stomach doing it. The articles linked to from this are barely notable in my opinion and I think that some of them would qualify for deletion at AfD or at very least merging... Since I am certain that Jax 0677 is reading these even though he is prohibited from participating in the discussion, I'm going to say this; you have six months that you can't touch or talk about these templates, I would suggest spending that time improving the actual articles that these navboxes are suppose to service and perhaps trying to turn some more of what should have been redlinks in these templates (redlinks are actually good) into blue links so that there will be plenty of pages to link to when the ban is over. Technical 13 (talk) 17:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Few articles linked to, and the articles linked to should arguably be at AfD.
  FurrySings (talk) 17:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• delete, to few core links. Frietjes (talk) 18:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This one's pretty much pointless per comments above. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is a spectacularly inappropriate navbox. The only directly-relevant link is the album
  Take Back the Fear, and I have just PRODded that. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stars Go Dim (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails

• Delete per nom, read comment above on #Template:Hail the Villain Technical 13 (talk) 17:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, too few core links. Frietjes (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Navigation to and from these articles remains relatively simple with or without this navbox. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:56, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Apart from the head article, there are only 4 links, which is less that the
  WP:GNG, so I have AFDed it: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Gone Mad). --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Addison Road (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails

• Delete While a link could have been included for Jenny Simmons, there is more information on the one song in the album article so I redirected it. Since the band has disbanded, navigation across these articles remains just as complete and simple without this navbox. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, read comment above on #Template:Hail the Villain Technical 13 (talk) 17:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, too few core links. Frietjes (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not enough directly relevant links. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Exhorder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Even with added links, this article fails

• Delete per nom, read comment above on #Template:Hail the Villain. + Sure, I would count demo, but not sure I would count the label... There is only one label, and it is linked in the infobox. Technical 13 (talk) 17:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, too few core links. Frietjes (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Two albums and a demo (whose article should probably be redirected) isn't enough to improve navigation over the main article itself. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.