Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 February 15
<
Log
February 15
Template:Reflistp
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ]
- Template:Reflistp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Now redundant: The function to view references within a section preview, previously provided by this template, is now provided automatically. See [1] : Noyster (talk), 21:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as no longer needed, though I'm very glad we had things like this before the "Preview of references" section! —PC-XT+ 23:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, and let me say that the the auto-preview feature is one of the most welcome changes in years! I don't know anything about template deletion, but can someone nominate Template:Reflistpx as well? EEng 00:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Done See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 February 16#Template:Reflistpx —PC-XT+ 07:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Vacations
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ]
- Template:Vacations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Orphan Template Ninney (talk) 06:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as this seems to violate several points of ]
- Delete as incoherent. --talk) 16:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ]
WP:NAVBOX No. 4: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template". 🇺🇸 Corkythehornetfan 🇺🇸 01:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ]
Template:Standings Table Start), if there were season articles that existed, which there are not any. 🇺🇸 Corkythehornetfan 🇺🇸 00:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).