Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 2

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log

October 2

Template:SHY48

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And here is number three, the third template for a sub-group of a band; it goes nowhere, and the sub-group's article is redirected. Drmies (talk) 22:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:BEJ48

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another template that goes nowhere; article is now redirected. Drmies (talk) 22:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:GNZ48

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a template that almost literally goes nowhere for a group with highly questionable notability. Drmies (talk) 22:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Steinmeier series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 21:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, all of the core links are section links. we have a TOC in the article for navigating between sections. Frietjes (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Echosmith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Had several non-notable entries removed, now fails

WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 21:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:BRoy Sidebar-mini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Bicycling in Chicago

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template full of redlinks. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep, I reformatted it as a navbox and added it to some articles. Frietjes (talk) 14:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep now. There are several blue links and likely to be more. Many templates start off with more red links than blue - after time the red tends to disappear. Grutness...wha? 15:20, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the blue links. I am not sure we should include all the redlinks at this time.--
    WP:WAWARD) 16:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's ).

Template:Star Wars timeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:StarTrekDS9 article

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, has been replaced by {{StarTrek.com link|DS9|...}}. Frietjes (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:St John Ambulance rank insignia England post-review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. The information is already at

]

Unused, not what template space is for Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Eraserheads album tracks templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's ).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only 3 songs from each of these track list templates have their own articles, but all of them are already and more appropriately linked in the {{Eraserheads}} navbox. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Ahnentafel4

Template:Ahnentafel5

Template:Ahnentafel6

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was merge to

]

Propose merging

Template:Ahnentafel-compact6
.
Please see above.
talk) 12:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:BSOD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough active links to be useful. --woodensuperman 09:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, no parent article. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, parent article and linked articles were deleted, no reason for template to remain. Lazz_R 23:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Spanish Radio Stations in Delaware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Urban War faction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Harvard Residential House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Table Melbourne top 20 birth countries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, if needed, the content can be placed directly in the article. Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).