Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 22

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< September 21 September 23 >

September 22

Template:PRCTownships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

({{PRC admin/ref sgc}} intentionally excluded, though it maybe should be deleted for a different reason) Totally overcomplicated system for storing data, which is in net used on only one article. Pppery 23:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, only used in one article. Use Wikidata. (This looks like an incomplete import of the zhwiki template, which was created before Wikidata was available.) Jc86035 (talk) 04:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Shooting at the 2014 Summer Youth Olympics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template that is nothing but redlinks Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The template was created with the idea that someone would create individual event pages. It's been three years since the event so I guess it should be deleted. JoshMartini007 (talk) 16:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:NYCS time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was no consensus.

WP:NPASR. Primefac (talk) 01:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

This doesn't really do much other than add <sup> to {{NYCS SSI}}. It's only directly used in {{NYCS time 2}} AFAIK. Jc86035 (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 11:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, 662 transclusions and nobody seems to know if it does anything (from the "AFAIK"). Christian75 (talk) 07:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Christian75: My initial post was formatted incorrectly ({{tag}} didn't display due to incorrect parameter order). All the template does is add <sup>. It is mentioned directly using template syntax on only these five pages. It is not used on any of the discussion pages since all mentions are inside <nowiki>, which leaves {{NYCS time 2}} and its sandbox, where it can be replaced by <sup>{{NYCS SSI|{{{1}}}|text={{{text}}}}}</sup>. Jc86035 (talk) 08:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Athletics at the 1930 British Empire Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. entirely red links except for 3 which all link to the same page. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Infobox royal house

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was merge.

(non-admin closure) J947(c) (m) 03:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Propose merging

Template:Infobox noble house
.
A few weeks ago it was decided to merge {{
YO 😜 22:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 17:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - that really is a no-brainer - then merge into Infobox family, per previous consensus. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and merge again (per Andy Mabbett), given the templates overlap and the distinction between nobility and royalty is not being made in any meaningful sense between the two. — OwenBlacker (talk) 19:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse,
talk) 17:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
They quite clearly have not been merged. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CDUAN Basketball roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted? Primefac (talk) 01:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

old, non-notable roster Frietjes (talk) 14:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_September_22&oldid=1079613823"